Isn't this post itself a big ad for the validity of the alleged Armenian genocide, where the poster has assumed without question the factual basis of the alleged horror?
Don't you find it strange that parliaments around the world are passing laws to establish, again, the validity of the alleged Armenian genocide? Why would any parliament anywhere need to pass a law on anything historical at all, unless it was being influenced by some kind of lobbying?
Armenian terrorists were swatting Turkish diplomats like flies in the 70s...in an act of revenge for the so-called genocide, murdering Turkish diplomat after diplomat.
It's clear these two nations were at war...what's even less clear to me now is that there ever was a genocide. I wonder how much lobbying and/or cash it took to get this story featured on Slashdot? Why is someone spending all this time and money to prove an alleged genocide through SEO and online lobbying?
Clearly Turkey needs to hire an agency on par or better than those of the Armenian lobbyists. That might work better than their offer of opening up military and government archives for neutral third party scrutiny - something which the Armenians have not reciprocated, and have not accepted at all.
If you are resorting to rewriting history through passing laws in parliaments and buying ad space on Slashdot...I seriously question the ground you're standing on. Seems like you're trying to fabricate some kind of truth or the other.
I'll shut up now, lest I myself get swatted by some Armenian hit squad, mistaking me for a Turkish diplomat on their kill list.
Shame on all of you Slashdot editors, for bringing up this huge advertorial without an ounce of integrity or dignity or question. I guess all of you guys were alive back in 1915 when all this came down and are reporting from firsthand experience, right?