Comment Execute, not send (Score 5, Insightful) 141
Comment Re: Yes, but that's not the issue. (Score 1) 410
Comment Re: Yes, but that's not the issue. (Score 4, Insightful) 410
Comment Worse engineers (Score 5, Insightful) 356
Comment Re: And then Google says... (Score 1) 1416
Comment Re:Cost is not the issue (Score 1) 654
Comment Re:Cost is not the issue (Score 1) 654
Comment Cost is not the issue (Score 4, Insightful) 654
Comment Re:Uncompetitive? (Score 1) 312
Comment Re:dayummm (Score 1) 229
Comment DE = Browser Border (Score 1) 818
Submission + - Most Ancient, 'Impossible' Alien Worlds Discovered (discovery.com) 1
Comment Re:Domination (Score 3, Informative) 198
The Japanese elite *may* have outlived the European/American elite but I'm gonna [citation needed] you on that one... The Japanese common man, however, certainly did NOT live longer or better than his Western counterpart.
I refer you to "Standard of Living in Japan Before Industrialization: From what Level did Japan Begin? A Comment" by Yasukichi Yasuba in The Journal of Economic History Vol. 46, No. 1 (Mar., 1986), pp. 217-224.
Yasuba takes to task the notion that life for the commoner in Japan was better than that in the West. While economic development HAD been ongoing throughout the Tokugawa shogunate, and circumstances had improved for the Japanese laborer, the reality of the situation is that farmers here and farmers there both were treated very poorly. He also points out, specifically, the flaw in Hanley's research (which estimated life expectancy to be around 40 years in Japan) specifically used a source which excluded year 0 deaths, and then substituted Western infant mortality rates in its place. At the time, Japan would be much closer to India than the West. By using data which matches temple records more closely, Yasuba suggests that the actual life expectancy of the time was around 35, which (again) puts it below the West.