Comment Re:Parent is spouting propaganda (Score 1) 186
I have never met one Chinese-born person at University who believed that the Communist Party should step down from power or criticized the government in any fundamental way. Not one. (Chinese-Americans, of course, are all over the spectrum when it comes to the Communist party and their right to rule.)
It's actually quite surprising because otherwise these are very smart people. However, if you ask about human rights violations, censoring, corruption, pollution, etc, they all just revert back to the party line. The ability of humans to have function despite cognitive dissonance is amazing.
This always makes me uneasy, because these are the Westernized elite, who in some cases have lived in America for a number of years. I can't imagine what the typical uneducated peasant must think.
Comment Re:US universities (Score 1) 441
For a private school, it shouldn't be any harder at all (admissions-wise). In fact, you may get a small advantage, since most universities value diversity (I had no idea how homogenous the US populace was until I spent a few years travelling). Many (though certainly not all) of the best American universities are private, and their admissions standards are accordingly strict, but being from another country shouldn't count against you in any way.
What? Compared to what country is the US population homogenous? Japan? Sweden? Botswana?
Are you sure the last time you visited wasn't in the 1960s?
Comment I expected better. (Score 1) 403
My AVG anti-virus caught this, but I would have thought the NY Times would have had better security.
Comment Re:Time to get up and go (Score 1) 693
Yeah, because all hunters know how to make their own ammunition and grow their own food.
Comment Re:Our guns vs. theirs (Score 1) 803
I agree.
The fact is that the US military today could annihilate any army on that was on the planet in World War I. A mere 90 years of technological innovation separates the two. I doubt only 90 years of technological innovation separates us from any aliens we would meet. Now imagine a few thousand years of technological innovation! We'd have about as much chance of fending of aliens as the Australian Aborigines had fending off the British.
Comment Re:Nothing wrong with his analogy (Score 5, Insightful) 567
Persecuted?
From Webster's dictionary:
" to cause to suffer because of belief"
I'm not sure how lack of Wikipedia access is comparable to being thrown in a death camp, but perhaps someone with more perspective can tell me.
Computer Science Major Is Cool Again 328
Comment Re:Geek imagination (Score 1) 239
A computer related example from Alternatehistory.com....
http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=49668
Comment Re:Geek imagination (Score 1) 239
There is a fairly dedicated internet community, both on Usenet and websites, dedicated to Alternate History and some writers have written involved timelines that span centuries usually based on simple what ifs? I've even seen some timelines that only involve computers.
It's a fun hobby for history nerds.
Comment Re:Typical day in the life of a blogger (Score 1) 89
$100/day plus expenses? Who is he, Jim Rockford?
Nice post.
Comment Re:Ignoring the Constitution is easy (Score 1) 1088
Since it is apparent you cannot read, I will spell it out for you:
"No STATE shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility."
Nowhere does it mention the Federal Government. It's talking about the individual states. Therefore, the Federal Government can print fiat money.
This is the exact reason the Founding Fathers implemented the Electoral College. Voters can't be bothered to inform themselves.
Comment Re:Let the CEO's work from India (Score 5, Insightful) 493
There are quite a few states without open container laws. Ditto for fireworks.
As for building your home without deed restrictions, that will depend on the place you are living. I imagine that rural Mississippi has many less requirements than say, San Francisco.
Actually, Mississippi meets all of your requirements. No open container law, no prohibition of fireworks, and few deed restrictions. In addition, you can vote, and your property can't be taken away without compensation.
Also, in Mississippi, you can do other stuff that you cannot in China, like own an handgun. Or vote.