... there are several ultra-portable rigs that can broadcast huge distances (thanks to atmospheric effects) with just a loop of wire thrown over a tree.

The KX1 comes to mind: http://www.elecraft.com/KX1/KX1.htm

So let me get this straight: an employee of a public institution (Cal Tech) gave some speeches that were recorded by a government-funded entity (the BBC), and in order to release those recordings to the public, a private individual (Bill Gates) had to purchase the rights? And rather than release in them in a standards-based format, we instead have to to download and install proprietary software (Silverlight) that we may not want on our computers?

After all, the Yellow Pages have an "Escorts" section as well.

There's *a lot* of stuff on the written that's not in the lab. Asking a couple of verbal questions about stuff candidates supposedly know from the written (but won't be tested on in the lab) seems worthwhile to me.

Also, it ensures that folks who have the highest-level Cisco certification (the PhD of networking) can coherently discuss their trade. At least when I took the CCIE, the first job offered after I passed was in Cisco's TAC - I would hate to call up a newly-minted CCIE there who *couldn't* answer verbal questions about the test material.

From TFA, the monopoly is on "after-market voice and data services" and applications for the iPhone.

The case law the judge cited was in regards to copy machines, namely Kodak using various illegal means to enforce a monopoly on replacement parts for Kodak copy machines. The Supreme Court ruled that the market for "Kodak copy machine replacement parts" was a different market than the market for "copy machines", and thus antitrust laws applied.

In this case, Apple has a monopoly on "iPhone applications" and AT&T has a monopoly on "voice and data service for the iPhone." If Apple allowed people to unlock their phones for use on other carriers, or to install apps not purchased through iTunes, no monopoly would exist.