Comment Re:Testing - The Anti Quality Process (Score 1) 342
I am not sure where you get the idea that I criticized Microsoft for not making universally usable software. The web page I put up is accessable to anyone that uses windows. The same applies to MS Word. Linux users have to use some other word processor.
My web page was put together to keep me amused and as a resource for looking for work. I don't know what costs might be born by others as a result.
Quality (or the lack of it) is an economic issue. If someone thought it was worth the cost to buy MS Windows just to read my web page, I would be very flattered but it is not likely to happen. The vast majority of PCs have Windows and MS IE.
Try to keep a focus on the topic which is the relationship between quality and testing. Its the message that is important, not the package. If it means a lot to you to look at my site, go visit a friend who has windows.
My web page was put together to keep me amused and as a resource for looking for work. I don't know what costs might be born by others as a result.
Quality (or the lack of it) is an economic issue. If someone thought it was worth the cost to buy MS Windows just to read my web page, I would be very flattered but it is not likely to happen. The vast majority of PCs have Windows and MS IE.
Try to keep a focus on the topic which is the relationship between quality and testing. Its the message that is important, not the package. If it means a lot to you to look at my site, go visit a friend who has windows.
