Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:What's the motivation? (Score 1) 120

I'll refrain from insults.

See

https://fdehydro.com/base-load...
-> Base Load = The minimum power a grid needs at all times, delivered at a steady, constant rate

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
-> Capacity factor = The net capacity factor is the unitless ratio of actual electrical energy output over a given
period of time to the theoretical maximum electrical energy output over that period.

And check the Wikipedia curve for different energy sources.

Comment Re:What's the motivation? (Score 1) 120

Nuclear power is dispatchable to some extent, meaning it can adapt to varying requests, but renewables are not.
A nuclear generator can generate electricity at any time of the day regardless of the weather or season
and typically has a capacity factor of 85-95 percent, meaning it delivers electricity almost all the time.
This makes nuclear power a reliable baseload power source.
Whereas for wind power that is only 25-40 percent.

Comment Re:What's the motivation? (Score 1) 120

Renewable energy sources are great and often cheap, but they have their problems.
The electricity grid has limitations because it was designed around centralized generation,
and the intermittent nature of solar and wind power has problems with reliability and storage.
There is a need for electricity even in the middle of windless winter nights,
and while nuclear power is not completely free from carbon emissions, it is much smaller than that of fossil fuels.

Comment Re:Sojust like every other tech growth story (Score 4, Informative) 220

The Chinese government funds innovation in China, while in the west it is private enterprise driven by the profits.
In China the government lead the development of technology with Government Guidance Funds and a somewhat bureaucratic process but with national long-term goals. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... A significant difference.

Comment Re:Data centers in space (Score 2) 101

Don't overlook the potential dangers.

We should be concerned about satellite collisions, perhaps between satellites from different companies or countries, and fear large-scale destruction involving many satellites.
There could be chain reactions of collisions.
There is already space debris tracked from previous collisions.
And then potential satellite debris falling to the ground, not mention the job of retiring satellites and the graveyard orbit.

And one should mention the potential consequences for, among other things, wind speed, the ozone layer, and the release of toxic substances.

Comment Re:Here we go again ... (Score 1) 72

Sea levels have varied greatly throughout history.
About 128,000 years ago they were 5-10 meters higher, when temperatures were only 0.5-1.5 degrees warmer than before pre-industrialization (1850-1900).
But sea levels were 125-134 meters lower than today's value about 20,000 years ago, when it was 5-7 degrees Celsius colder.
Then levels rose due to melting ice and the expansion of warm water.

You should consider the consequences for 110 million people living below sea level, and 10% of the world's population that lives near the sea, and take into account that rising sea levels affect freshwater, agriculture, and ecosystems.

Slashdot Top Deals

Pause for storage relocation.

Working...