Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Submission + - California Legislature Passes Delete Act Regulating Data Brokers (iapp.org)

An anonymous reader writes: The California State Legislature passed Senate Bill 362, the Delete Act, which is designed to streamline consumers' ability to request the deletion of their personal information collected by data brokers. The bill now awaits the signature of Gov. Gavin Newsom, D-Calif., though he reportedly has given no indication whether he will sign the bill, according to CBS News. Newsom has until 14 Oct. to sign the bill.

Should it become law, the Delete Act would empower the CPPA to develop a system by 2026 that allows residents to make a single data deletion request across the nearly 500 registered data brokers operating in the state. The CPPA would also be charged with enforcing provisions of the Delete Act, such as requiring data broker registration and ensuring brokers delete an individual's personal information every 45 days upon receipt of a verified request. [...] The Delete Act was first introduced by state Sen. Josh Becker, D-Calif., who previously said the legislation patches a loophole in the California Consumer Privacy Act that allowed for consumers to request individual data brokers delete information obtained directly from them but did not require entities to delete personal information aggregated from other sources.

Comment Rather odd timing, don't you think? (Score 1) 49

Why, after presenting one of the single most popular gadgets at CES, would they start considering ditching the mobile unit? That was a terrible decision! While I don't know what's gonna happen, I think the Rollable (with a better name) could turn everything around for that division. As always, time will tell.

Comment How would M$ "embrace and extend" open source? (Score 1) 99

By what mechanism, methodology, or machination would Microsoft be able to "embrace and extend" open source, as a whole or piecemeal? How would this even work? From what I understand, the original rights holder would have to re-designate an open source project as closed source for that to happen. I'm likely wrong, but that's the impression I've gotten for years. Anything forked would then be a new instance of that open source project, so that project owner would then have to also re-designate the forked project as closed source as well? Of the almost quarter century that I've been using open source as a non-developer, I've seen a lot of how all this works, but I'm still unclear on all this. A little breakdown would be appreciated.

Slashdot Top Deals

Radioactive cats have 18 half-lives.

Working...