Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment CAFE-like regulation? (Score 1) 286

Why couldn't the federal government regulate internet speeds similar to how they regulate automobile fuel economy? It couldn't be as straightforward, but perhaps they could stop the ISPs from listing max speeds (the whole "up to 20 Mbps" crap) and specifying percentages for speeds over time (e.g., customer must receive 95% of the bandwidth they are paying for 100% of the time). They could also force minimum bandwidth plans that must be provided and because of the lack of competition in certain geographical areas, even stipulate a maximum cost per Mbps of speed based on national averages of broadband fees.

CAFE has certainly forced auto manufacturers to invest in new technology in order to meet new standards (to varying degrees of success).

Comment Some of the "DRM" is mandated ... (Score 1) 403

While I generally support the notion that if you own the vehicle you should be allowed to hack the vehicle, some of the protections for in-vehicle electronics are either mandated by external entities or self-imposed.

Someone mentioned earlier the fact that auto manufacturing today is global in scope. That is a fact, and the electrical systems in vehicles today are designed to be used in as many markets as possible to minimize engineering costs.

Since virtually all of the ECUs in a vehicle are reprogrammable these days, and since many of those ECUs are involved in the security features built into vehicles these days, the European Insurance lobby (whose name escapes me at the moment) requires auto manufacturers selling vehicles in Europe to "secure" their ECUs against tampering. This allows the manufacturer to obtain good ratings from the insurance providers, otherwise the vehicle is essentially docked points for being unsecure. These features obviously affect the average consumers ability to do things to their vehicles.

Secondly, as more and more features are software driven, the OEMs have the ability to provide vehicle features via software. Therefore they have some incentive to "secure" the ECUs in order to prevent customers from obtaining features that they either didn't pay for or should not be enabled in the vehicle depending on where it was sold.

Somehow I doubt that Nader is taking any of this into consideration, and I highly doubt his initiative will gain enough momentum to overcome these hurdles.

Slashdot Top Deals

No user-servicable parts inside. Refer to qualified service personnel.

Working...