Oh how wrong you are. You are tracked by IP, MAC, hardware IDs, your browser fingerprints that include your OS, language, time zone, screen size, pixel ratio, touch support, how many available CPU threads you have, approximate RAM, your GPU renderer, your installed fonts, how Canvas/WebGL/and audio tests behave, your HTTP headers, your TCP behavior, your HTTPS handshake, your JA3 and JA4 fingerprints, your TLS options... among other things. You leave a unique signature everywhere you go on that computer.

stop making huge games? No. Come up with a better model, like the one OnLive is working on? Yes. Even if you don't try a developers title with OnLive, they still get paid. Even if you try 1 title that you even slightly enjoy in a month, the cost of OnLive is as cheap as entertainment gets (with the exception of NetFlix/Gamefly as it would be the same price ;))

You do realize that every other, non Model S car, ever made, ALWAYS have their door handles popped out, right?

Why in the world would you allow access to a line in a database while simultaneously allowing access to another DB with the same line of data? This is easily disallowed by properly using reference ID's, which should have been implemented during the conceptualization of the DB at the very beginning but could still easily be attached to the entire DB. Don't allow data edits without first locking that line in the database, cross-referencing the reference ID, and preventing that same reference ID, regardless of which other DB is exists on) to be modified. If you don't know how to accomplish this with Oracle, or even SQL, you do not have any business touching the database to begin with. Based on your answers, and how ridiculously they've been modded, goncept you barely understand databasing at all.