Comment Re:No (Score 1) 16
Look on the bright side, it is no longer the sign of a dullard if you do not in fact rtfa. I certainly didn't.
Look on the bright side, it is no longer the sign of a dullard if you do not in fact rtfa. I certainly didn't.
Now I hear you, but just think about what happened in the food industry when they found out customers would not pay higher prices, but would gladly eat shit if it came in the same box as their childhood reward foods.
I was not trying to say riders do not have a right to defend themselves from attackers, if that was how you read it. I am suggesting that Waymo's contracts may be so full of waivers that Waymo would get into more trouble if they allow the car to be used to drive over attackers than if they literally allow the murder to take place.
If this seems unlikely, my basis for this line of thinking is Disney attempting to use, what was it, a Disney+ trial subscription EULA as part of their justification they were not responsible for someone dying to food allergens? Something along those lines.
I would like to point out that the rider signed a fuckton of waivers to his legal rights, and the attacker...did not.
I was referring to a series of trials involving some earthquake scientists being found guilty of manslaughter for minimizing the risk of an earthquake.
You should think twice before saying this rocks.
It is dangerous to be a geologist in Italy.
I genuinely and wholeheartedly believed this kind of thing would be good, because it would create a world where ideologies could get called out on their ability to predict consequences. I see now that I failed to predict the consequence of people being desperate for lies to be true. I feel pretty stupid in retrospect. Kind of...ignored a lesson I've already learned a few times the punchy way. Oof.
Posted from my iPhone,â,â(TM)..-/:;()$&&
I can not express how few fucks I give about these stupid edge cases. Itâ(TM)s a fucking clock. I donâ(TM)t care who the âoewinnersâ are.
Apple's sheer inability to utilize their own hardware would be, quite hilariously, an valid point of legal debate here I think.
That being said, can you actually justify the software developers for a company as big as apple NOT coming up with the items in question as a top feature to include?
Reminds me of that time I tried to buy a laen knife.
That's what Mcdonalds is for.
Speaking of numbers, does this disprove reality is a simulation, or does it merely disprove that it is a digital simulation? A lot of math used to be analog slide rules and "good enough's", right? Maybe I don't understand the claim.
Clippit walked so that your budget library computer would stagger and collapse. Funny how it made older office computers completely unusable, now wasn't it?
I think I misused in vitro. Then again, did I?
1 + 1 = 3, for large values of 1.