Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:CTWM is pretty cool (Score 1) 42

As long as killing/crashing a screensaver process unlocks the desktop, X is a no-go for anyone who cares about security. I recently upgraded from a DVI monitor to a Display Port monitor. If I turn the screen off or it goes to sleep, the desktop resets itself to a tiny resolution and its panels crash. That moves and resizes all the windows that were open. Turning the monitor back on, you can see all the desktop windows while the desktop switches to the 'new' monitor's resolution even when the screen is locked. That's simply unacceptable. Looking for fixes, apparently it's a well know bug that simply connecting a 2nd modern display lets you crash a lock screen and gain access. I require better security than that.

I don't think Wayland does that. I'll be looking into switching to it this week if I can't find another solution. Basic failures like that sometimes makes me want to go back to Windows.

Comment Re:Project is a copy of AmazonBrandFilter plug-in (Score 2) 122

At least Knockoff mentions that in their readme:

Research that shaped this design: AmazonBrandFilter (allowlist approach; its MIT-licensed community list seeded Knockoff's own), SoldBy (seller-country lookup and its rate-limit lessons), and The Markup's Amazon Brand Detector. Knockoff's contribution is combining a community allowlist with a heuristic scorer, with the allowlist as veto.

Comment Re:Not based on mirror (Score 2) 72

Coming next month, that LED now strobes in a unique pattern used as an identifier so all videos can be tracker to their creator.

Is that a good feature or not? I don't know. I just know it's going to happen. Then I'm guessing every other camera will adopt similar tech. It will be mandated by law to protect our kids (meaning Facebook will push it hard so every camera sold will have to pay Facebook patient royalties on the tech).

Comment Increased RISK not CHANCE and only 7 DAYS! (Score 1) 88

A 10% increase in risk of XYZ means if you have a 0.001% of XYZ happening to you, then a 10% increase takes you to 0.0011%.

Also, what is up with "Participants were followed for a median of 12.38 years" and "methodological limitations were... measurement imprecision due to having only 7 days of accelerometer wear." Does that mean this study only looked at 7 days of data then 12 years later they checked on who died? Wow. Sort of makes the whole thing meaningless (and if so then fuck you to all the news articles implying it was 12 years of data). As if people never change their habits nor activity levels from week to week.

I bet the data is skewed to people who recently died too. Someone dying from cancer isn't going to be very active (though how many wear health monitors?). If those people were bed ridden that week then died within the next year or two and everyone else lived, that could skew the results. Though they claimed to factor in "health-status factors" so maybe they took that into account?

Comment Re: Pleasure helmet? (Score 1) 37

It will exist in our lifetime, unless outlawed like human cloning. This seems to be one area sci-fi media is lacking. I wonder what it'll do to animal training and how much it'll screw them up with their owners being able to directly and artificially stimulate their brains.

I wonder if we'll get the opposite too: For criminals, go through this brain pain punishment or spend XX years in jail. Well I guess we could do that now and we don't so that probably won't happen. It'll be go to jail and get zapped if you don't listen to the jailers fast enough. That kind of already happens.

Instead of pleasure, you can use pain to halt addictions too. Spend a few moments inflecting sudden pain in different environments whenever you smell alcohol and you'll quickly build a trauma response to avoid it. Not sure if that stops the addictions or leaves you in a messed up state of both wanting to have and trying to avoid the thing.

Comment Re:This line was such a tell (Score 1) 69

It's not really incompetence as it is policy. You cut everything you can and restore the things that people complain the most about. This way you get rid of the waste and the important things stay around. You don't have to spend the time and funds needed to research every program before you cut it. Just cut it now and see if something breaks. You can argue how effective that is, but it is a way of operating.

"Move fast and break things." The problem with doing this on non-software systems is you can't trivially roll back to the non-broken version.

Slashdot Top Deals

A debugged program is one for which you have not yet found the conditions that make it fail. -- Jerry Ogdin

Working...