You have not provided any relevant information. You provided a link to the fundamentalist Christian equivalent of a PBS video, "Unlocking the Mystery of Life", but that's not a scientific reference, and I doubt you'd be satisfied if I in turn pointed you to a PBS video on evolution.

There is a difference between you and I, if you point me at a PBS, National Geographic or Discovery Channel special on evolution I will be familiar with their works and know their short comings. I have studied both sides of the issue. The video "Unlocking the Mystery of Life" is a scientific summary of the discoveries these scientists have made, they have also backed up their work with scientific publications.

Do you have any idea how hard it is to get scientific work on cosmology or our origins published if your work does not conclude with some sort of statement supporting evolution? This is considered heresy to science itself, it is like the inquisition of Science to speak against the holy grail of "Neo-Darwinian" evolution. If you are truly interested in the truth, I encourage you to examine both sides of the argument.

There are literally hundreds if not thousands of scientists from diverse backgrounds coming to the same conclusions, and you only need to start doing a little digging to find out about the grass-roots movement taking place. Do you think the Discovery Institute and Institute for Creation Research where started because a few scientists had a screw loose? These brave scientists are stepping forward, having their good name smeared and in some cases risking their careers because they have discovered something in the scientific record that is not being told by rehashing the same old tired theory over and over and over again with no results.

I was once like you, I thought science had put a nail in the coffin of the Biblical Record then I started learning a little here and there and all of a sudden a mountain of scientific evidence appeared in support of the Bible. I am amazed at how often the truth is bent to ensure the Bible does not get credit for being correct; for example, is the universe expanding? We all know it is right, prove it, you cannot, all you can prove is there has been an expansion. You don't know if the redshifts are from a previous expansion or the universe is expanding.

So text books teach Hubble's Law as:

r=v/H

Unfortunately this is not what Hubble discovered, this is what he discovered:

r=z/h

Notice there is no velocity in the equation.

I my be stupid and dumb like people say I am, though one thing I am not is a blind follower, I scrutinize everything I learn because that is exactly what my Physics professors and the Bible taught me:

11 Now these were more noble-minded than those in Thessalonica, for they received the word with great eagerness, examining the Scriptures daily to see whether these things were so.
Acts 17:11

Have you ever thought about the consequences of an expanding universe that is actually expanding at the speed the redshifts are indicating? Have you ever explored the scientific explanations for the problems that arise if the universe is actually expanding at near light speed, the fact that you must break the law's of physics to achieve this objective.

Can you explain why, if you take a sample of lava from the bottom of the Grand Canyon which contains all the major isotopes for radioisotope dating the different isotope dates disagree by 1.5 billion years, which one is correct? Have you ever wondered why the lava in the Grand Canyon contains Helium in amounts that should have only taken 6,000 years to leach out of the rocks? Why are we finding skin on T-Rex, Mt St Helens creating what is called the little Grand Canyon in a few days not billions of years?

Scientists have a lot of explaining to do and while they are doing it I whish they would keep their personal belief system out of the class room, that includes "Neo-Darwinian" evolution.

God bless you and keep you,
LovedByGod

Kyle: Whoa, Cartman. Talk about wide load.

Cartman: Yeh, I'm really starting to fill out nicely.

Kyle: You're not filling out nicely, you're fatter than ever!

Cartman: I'm not fat! I'm getting in shape.

Kyle: Cartman, you're such a fat ass that when you walk down the street people go "@*& @#*&% it, that's a big fat ass!"

Cartman: No they don't, you jealous weakling.

Townsman: God damn, that's a big fat ass!

Cartman: Hey!

As a former member of the U.S. Army and a veteran of the first Gulf War, I am well aware that armies are designed to go places and break things. In Basic Training we were taught how to shoot and use a bayonet, not how to distribute food off the back of a pickup truck.

That said, the U.S. military is not full of bloodthirsty killers. Sure, you may occasionally run into the REMF yahoo who is eager to "go to war" but any soldier, sailor, airman or Marine with time under his or her belt will know the sobering facts of war: deployment away from ones' family and the potential loss of life.

These guys also are well aware of the fact that you don't earn the trust and favor of the people you are trying to liberate by killing indiscriminately....which is the key motivation behind the development of smart munitions such as cruise missiles and laser-guided bombs.

And these are the weapons that can be more accurately guided (not just at the bad guys but away from the innocents) by the kind of flying robot discussed earlier. If nothing else, it can give a squad leader a birds-eye-view of the area so he can avoid taking his people into an ambush or getting civilians caught in a crossfire.