Comment Pietzki (Score 1) 161
[sarcasm]yeah, nothing but advertising and market share. I mean if they really wanted to make a difference, why don't they just target the causes of problems?[/sarcasm] seriously people... yes, google (or anyone for that matter) could pump this money into feeding people for a year or two, but after that, things would still be the same. Western civilisation has been giving aid for how long now? And how much difference has it made (apart from keeping people alive another day so they can suffer tomorrow instead)? I am all for help for the poor and needy, it - but I beg to differ on what constitutes REAL help. I used to think that we should just support poor countries as much as we can, but now I know that the only way any country will ever learn to stand on its own two feet is if (well meaning but ultimately flawed) handouts stop.
The economic recovery of Germany after WW2 didn't occur because people just 'gave' Germany food and medical care. It occurred because under the Marshall plan, the US made long term investments into infrastructure and the economy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wirtschaftswunder
I'm not saying that google has no other motives than helping the needy, but neither did the US with post WW2 Germany. If they can make a buck while doing good, then good on 'em!
Please people - read, and then think before you form an opinion!