Comment Re: Is it good? (Score 1) 92
Comment Re:WTF Slashdot.. (Score 1) 307
I know no ones ever read the fucking article, but what if there is not even a linked article ??
Click the "shares a report" link
The Most Popular Linux Desktop Programs (zdnet.com) 228
Comment Re: Genius (Score 1) 291
Comment Re: Saponins (Score 1) 292
Comment Re: Single use? (Score 1) 761
Comment Re: Have to give it to Apple..... (Score 1) 771
Comment Re: The moderationg system needs an overhaul. (Score 1) 1839
Comment Re:Mageia (Score 1) 167
Comment Re:Not a problem anyway (Score 1) 70
If one of the the biggest banks in my country pulls in background images from http, on there https secure account login page, this can't be a security risk, can it?
It can be, if the bank's using that as the "known image" so you "know" you're on the correct page. Phishing attacks would become easier if attackers could use this to figure out which images were associated with which user accounts.
Submission + - IBM Paying $1.5 Billion to Shed Its Chip Division (mashable.com)
Submission + - Dr.Who to teach kids to code (theregister.co.uk)
Submission + - European Health Levels Suddenly Collapsed After 2003 And Nobody is Sure Why (medium.com)
Comment Re: Oh No! Global warming is wrong! (Score 1) 238
In my experience the EPA figures have usually off by several MPG, with "American" cars typically having lower MPG than the EPA estimates and "foreign" cars typically higher. It's odd that I don't see GM and Chrysler being investgated. Or perhaps the EPA itself needs to be investigated...
This used to be true. The EPA revised how MPG is calculated a few years back (2008 I think). It's more-accurate now. That's why you'll see a people posting below that they get better than the EPA estimate.