69

YouTube is owned by Google. Google is owned by the Israeli zionist behind the government, wall street and all these big corporations. (Google's founders are Jewish, remind you)

and pass the money on the table (a.k.a. chip dumping)

A utopia is a prison. Free Beer or Freedom. Choose one.

My post rebutts authoritarians, and even expose their secret identity. And I get modded down. Yout are right, the /. demographics are leaning towards Maoist.

The hidden Zionist master have the final say, including the decision to enslave and torture all goyims.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/americans-giving-passports-jump-sixfold-105958873.html Americans renouncing U.S. citizenship surged sixfold in the second quarter from a year earlier as the government prepares to introduce tougher asset-disclosure rules. Time for Lulzsec and other convicted freedom fighters who get slapped with million dollar fines to defect to China, the bastion of human rights.

Mao Zedong once said: Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun. "Criminal Justice" is just a political tool to suppress the oppressing view. People just need to stand united and forge their own destiny. Having no government is better than having any government. You take charge of your own destiny. That's REAL democracy. BTW Aaron Swartz is Jewish. This is why he gets such treatment. Look at how the Obama Administration treats Israel, compare to his muslim buddies.

Call your local congressman and support this crucial budget cut in the name of freedom. If it is a "D", tell them it supports freedom of information and more open, advanced internet. If it is a "R", tell them it supports reducing the deficit.

Ben Shalom Bernanke & Co. generates some number in their computer and buying U.S. treasury bills, which in terms fund the government at low interest rates. Let's see who is going to mod this comment down for being anti-Semitic.

to the big telcos. Treat it as a form of stimulus.

Enjoy your enslaved goyim puppet ni66er president and your U.S. Zionist occupied government while you can. Because soon we will exercise our 2nd amendment right on your tiny little ass.

Want to see all those dark skin Asian ni66ers vs the sub-Saharan types tn these re-education camps, who get a better ass rape?

The government don't give a shit to its own citizens.

with fraudulent resume, fraudulent credentials and sometimes fraudulent identity. As a technical recruiter with no experience in coding, it has always been traditional to pass along candidates that look good on paper after an initial HR screen for a tech interview with a stakeholder. Trouble started coming when individuals would share tech interview questions on online pages particular to either international sites or user groups. The answers were there too. I have used some usual introduction type questions that a tech may use as a foundation for the rest of the interview at times. Agencies would ask those they referred for the questions and they would coach the next interviewees on how to answer. My 'favorite' one was having someone on a speaker phone where another person was answering the question in the background in a foreign language. The first time it seemed only a coincidence, after the third and then fourth answer it was an obvious ruse. I ended the call. I get helping people and attempting to get them in the door, however, when it is used when the inexperienced coder gets through the door, especially from some international areas, then their fellow country folk tend to cover for them until they are found out. If only we in the US and Europe would cover for each other this way. Anyway, I agree that the tech interview will go away in some form or another. I like the idea of a test, however, it must be valid and then also the set of questions should be fluid and change often, although validated. I mean by this that the test should have multiple questions that would be randomly asked so that someone could not coach someone else through the q and a. My other favorite by the way was when engaging an agency of someone I knew well and actually trusted not to share information with candidates, went so far as to share questions that I asked and the person copied and pasted the answer verbatim from the original source. What were they thinking???