Comment Re:40% heavier than lead (Score 5, Informative) 54
Comment Re:Exquisite Use(overuse) Of Hyper Text (Score 2) 226
Comment Smithers! (Score 1) 562
Comment cold fusion redux (Score 1) 368
Comment My bird wants one (Score 1) 182
Comment Re:is the delta v that bad? (Score 1) 80
Comment is the delta v that bad? (Score 1) 80
Comment Re:Seems the LHC's win was an IT win (Score 1) 652
Comment Re:So why the right hand? (Score 3, Informative) 258
"Now," the physicist admits "this all assumes that the aliens haven't swapped the direction of time on us as well! Buggers might just have effects preceding causes." (See CPT symmetry)
Comment Not So Fast, Einstein. (Score 2) 262
Comment Re:Geeks never throw away old tech stuff (Score 1) 71
They just can't part with the Tevatron . . . this recycling line is just an excuse to keep it around.
Assuming you would want to, it is non-trivial to just dispose of 4 miles of superconducting magnets.
Anyways, the part of the Tevatron that you are most likely to find reuse is the 4 miles of tunnel. The civil construction to dig a tunnel that big, complete with tunnel penetrations and service buildings is a significant portion of the cost of any project. You would be a fool to just fill in such a valuable commodity just because you don't have a use of it today.
And that's ignoring all the parts that are already being scrounged for use in the NoVA upgrades. So no, keeping it around is not merely a case of geek sentiment.