Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. ×
United States

Journal Philip K Dickhead's Journal: "Release the Tiger!" 3

We already allow fingerprints for arrest, not just conviction. What's the big deal about DNA sampling? We already allow DNA sampling for arrest, not just conviction... what's the big deal about chipping?

computer station x43
"Sir we got the comrade located at 36 38 51.1 N 94 35 5.3 W No other heat signatures in the area..."
"Thanks, Sam. Bob... release the tiger!"

That's why it is for me, a watershed event.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

"Release the Tiger!"

Comments Filter:
  • It _is_ unfair to the arrested and unconvicted to forcibly take their DNA samples.

    That is why I advocate the State taking DNA samples voluntarily at birth, and as a condition of first use of any tax-payer subsidized goods or services.

    And I am not for releasing the tiger, either, in the case of unauthorized use of taxpayer goods or services. I think deportation is sufficient, to a country of their choosing, or with a taxpayer-supplied raft in international waters.

    Same deal for not paying taxes, after

Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (6) Them bats is smart; they use radar.