Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Cut lives saving USAID and spread job killing A (Score 2) 40

we did it because we didn't want the communists to have a reputation of being nicer than us,
we did it because we didn't want these countries owing the communists favors.
we did it because we can ask them for a favor and they won't say "why should we help you what have you ever done for us?"
we did it because every dollar spent in that way saves $2 on bullets down the road.
we did it because its to our benefit to keep these countries from deteriorating which will eventually blow back on us.
we did it because we are the wealthiest country in the world and we don't even notice it.
we did it because it's the moral thing to do.

Comment Re: No Shit! (Score 1) 339

Not My opinion, It's the Judges opinion, the only opinion that counts here. Funny you trust ICE's word over the courts.
A bounty hunters authority to apprehend is often granted by the contract between the bondsman and the defendant. -pointless example, do more reading, you agreed to the apprehension methods when you took the money from the bail bondsman.

You seem to really want to strip my rights away, you have lots of justifications for why we need to have less rights.
Yes: Ree ree ree I'm sure it's all just noise to you since you don't seem to understand the concept of Rights.
Don't care what some other dude is going through on this thread.
That's not making your rationalizations any better. And that's all you have here:
Rationalizations on why we should gut the 4th amendment.
No thanks, boot licker.

Comment Re: No Shit! (Score 1) 339

So again you're all for diminishing the protections of the 4th amendment, substituting some bullshit administrative warrants in place of the more stringent judicial warrants. And running to the supreme court to rule on that because ITS NOT LEGAL NOW.

Fuck right off with that. I prefer the existing levels of protection, the stuff we learned about in elementary school called checks and balances, not some new theory that just happens to give the administration even more power to walk all over our rights.
Once again: Fuck right off with that bootlicker.

Comment Re: No Shit! (Score 2) 339

Does the boot taste good? Just sprinkle on some flimsy legalisms to discard judicial oversight over my constitutional protections!
Save me from the scary migrant "invasion"! The 'Adminstration' is so totally trustworthy it can sign it's own warants.

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety
-Ben Franklin

Slashdot Top Deals

Nothing is finished until the paperwork is done.

Working...