What kind of idiotic argument could anyone possibly come up with that putting an end to pollution emissions could be harmful?
Imagine if we made our energy generation cheaper, cleaner and more efficient, and it was all for nothing?
Maybe.
A funnier answer than most will give credit for.
"Apple announced today plans to create a $1 billion fund to promote creation of advanced manufacturing jobs in the U.S. "
And I have plans to create a fund to promote creation of a plan to believe them, too.
Once it backs up from the other direction, and they can't back up either, it will create a lovely snarl that people will learn to avoid.
Apparently your suggestion to this "foreign" traffic causing congestion in your sainted neighborhoods is to create congestion in your neighborhoods.
Meanwhile the corals adjust their symbiotic alga.
I would be very interested in a cite to show that corals can do this, and the mechanism by which you claim corals perform this adjustment.
You know, abortion has very little to do with the woman's body. She's just the gateway. She's not actually doing anything to her body.
OK - you can make decisions in all pregnancies that exist independent of women's bodies.
Likewise, it's not racist to have no attraction to somebody of the opposite race, just as it's not sexist for homosexuals to have no attraction to the opposite sex.
There is an opposite race?
The number who agree on human causes and extent is nowhere near that high, though.
OK then, try the number of Scientific Organizations That Hold the Position That Climate Change Has Been Caused by Human Action. Try to find one that doesn't.
That 95% figure that gets thrown around is from an *extremely* small sample size. Worth some googling to see the entire truth behind that.
NASA say 97%. And cite multiple sources.
Frankly there is a famous Time cover in the 70s talking about Iceball earth where the fear was we were going to enter into a new ice age. Guess that one didn't pan out.
Frankly there isn't, and you have admirably demonstrated one of the problems - you have believed an utter fabrication by the denialists. There was no such Time cover. Read Time about it here:
http://science.time.com/2013/0...
Getting the idea?
It only takes an honest man to say what everyone can see.
So off you go to IPCC and see what honest scientists are saying.
The latest IPCC report has backed away from the doom and gloom.
[Citation needed]
You are also starting from a premise that the IPCC report was ever about "doom and gloom", which it wasn't.
I knew that my babie one day saves the world, but I never guessed it was so early in my little sunshine's life.
The technical term is babby.
I think many people are forgetting that Newton and Christ do not share the same birthday...
Forgetting also that only one of them actually existed. Protip - it was Newton.
I cannot believe that God plays dice with the cosmos. -- Albert Einstein, on the randomness of quantum mechanics
