Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Yawn... Democrats are left (Score 1) 741

You live in North Korea? Because I live in Europe and the democrats are definitely left wing compared to Europe. Both the democrats and republican parties are extremely broad political party's. The democrats are from the far left to the political middle. Comparing to European party's it contains anything from socialists, greens, socialdemocrats, socialliberals to center liberals, left christian democrats (I am using liberal not as the synonym for left but as the political liberalism). Sanders is radical left but other democrats are much closer to the middle. The republicans are from the center to far right. Comparing to European party's It contains anything from center liberals, conservative-liberals, christian democrats, moderate nationalists, conservatives, orthodox religious conservatives. Palin is far right religious orthodox but Giuliani is pretty liberal.

Comment Anonymous hates democracy and freedom (Score 1) 741

Aparently Anonymous doesn't like democracy or freedom. Whether or not you agree or disagree with Trump. Disagreements should be debated in the political arena. With arguments. Doing stuff like this is a sign of weakness, apparently they have no arguments against him. Tactics like this is what fascists, national socialists, communists and islamists use. Attacking political opponents. Anonymous is like a totalitarian dictatorship. Deciding what is best for us to see or not see. Like Kim Jong Il, Stalin, Hitler, Saddam,Islamic State, Taliban, Hamas or other totalitarian nutcases. If everybody were to take down sites of people with different opinions it would become a big mess. Democracy is all about making different opinions and then make a choice. I think that if the fascist scriptkiddie cowards of Anonymous (if they were men they wouldn't do it anonymous) would attack a candidate that is all the more reason to vote for that candidate.

Comment A-29? Just keep and update the A-10 (Score 1) 320

Whats the point of an A-29? It might have some good air to ground capabilities but it totally inferior to the A-10, which can take hits and survive has a bigger gun and carries more ordnance. The A-10 can also fly slow and fly from unpaved runways. The F-35 is great as a super fighter with secondary bombing capabilities (like the F-16). As a fighter outperformed only by the F-22. But its to vulnerable for close air support. Any unarmored aircraft is vulnerable in the close air support role. That goes for both F-35 and A-29. Although losing an F-35 is a lot more money. I don't see any use fore A-29. Simply get more A-10's back into service and upgrade them (or build new ones).

Comment Big diffirence between evolution and climate chang (Score 1) 591

Its good that a scientific fact such as evolution is learned at school. Evolution is a scientific fact. There is no scientist that disagrees with it. The only people who disagree with it are radical religious people because it contradicts with their religion. Climate change is something totally different. That is if with that they mean man made global warming. Because climate change is normal, it has always been changing (ice ages, warm periods). Whether the earth is heating upp is up to debate. Scientists disagree about this. The last 15 years it has not gotten any warmer. Even among scientists who believe that there is a warming they disagree in the cause. Whether its natural or there is a human cause. Of those that believe there is a human factor they disagree how big the human factor is. From slightly helping a natural phenomenon to causing in. Global warming believers ignore natural factors such as the activity of the sun. Or other facts. Facts are that humans produce less then 4% of all CO2. CO2 has never driven climate in the past. In fact, information from ice drills proved that there was a link between climate and CO2 but its the other way around. When the temperature rises CO2 rises, when the temperature drops CO2 levels drop. But CO2 lags behind 500 years. This is because oceans let go CO2 when they heat and take it in when they cool down. But they take a very long time to heat or cool.

Comment Snowden is a threat to national security (Score 1) 344

Snowden commenting about threat to national security of the US? Sounds kinda funny considering he spilled classified information himself, betrayed his country, defected to a (potential) enemy nation where he is sharing all kind of secrets with. If Putin's puppet shouldn't comment on 1 thing its about threatening national security of the US. What Clinton did was stupid but not anywhere as much a threat to national security as what Snowden did (sharing all kinds of secrets with Russia).

Comment Interesting, but... (Score 1) 755

Interesting experiment. I do have moral problems in giving away money to people who do not need it. Or who simply don't want to work. For instance people who are handicapped should receive more money then healthy people because they are not able to work or are not able to work the same amount of hours that a healthy person can, or receive lower wage because their handicap makes them slower. So I think for those people the basic income should be higher. Also how high would it be? Just enough to pay for basic needs (so same as welfare)? Or higher? Whether or not people work depends in part to how high it will be. What happens if you work? If you keep the minimum income regardless of what you do that might trigger some people who have welfare to work because they keep the money they earn whereas today in most countries if you can't earn more then the welfare they cut your welfare (so you profit nothing). So today it doesn't make sense to work unless you can earn more then welfare. I am worried that a minimum income will cause huge inflation. Rising costs like rent, prices of products etc.. Which would make it useless (or making it rise endlessly). Won't this just benefit the rich? People who currently get a lot of support will probably get the sum of that support (welfare, rent support, health support etc.) as basic income. Whereas rich people will have their current income plus the basic income.

Comment Hacking is worse then cheating (Score 1) 446

Off course cheating is immoral. But so is hacking and publishing personal information. Actually that is worse. Cheating is just immoral, but not a crime. Hacking and violation of privacy is immoral AND a crime punishable by law. Besides who says the account info is correct? What is people make accounts using someone elses name? I would asume that if you want to start an affair you won't use your own name and address. People who don't cheat can get in trouble because people use their names on this site.

Slashdot Top Deals

Many people are unenthusiastic about your work.

Working...