Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment MOXIE is a pointless (Score 1) 42

The MOXIE experiment is stunt, a pointless stunt. It displaced real science for a stunt to please the Manned Mission Directorate. This Directorate just cannot help themselves and they are always mucking up real science.

This idiotic experiment could have been done in any of a hundred college basements....but now the rover has to lug this dead weight all over the surface. If we must have such a pointless experiment, why not do it on a stationary lander.....

Comment Re:You Mean... (Score 1) 131

It is so creepy that China is so paranoid that they have to astroturf Slashdot with this propaganda. Just creepy. The more you astroturf, the more creepy you get.

The evidence is overwhelming the the virus came from a lab in Wuhan. And there is plenty of evidence that it is a result of a gain-of-function experiment (i.e. the virus was engineered to infect humans) gone out of control.

Comment Re:Witchhunt. (Score 4, Insightful) 131

It is really creepy that China is so paranoid that it has to astroturf even minor sites such as slashdot.

Sure there is no proof the COVID-19 was studied in the two Wuhan viral lab, but there is a ton of proof that these labs studied corona viruses in bat; they published articles about it. Even their gain of function work was well document.

But you (i.e. the Chinese Communist Party) would have us believe that of all the thousands of wet markets in China, the one next to the labs is where the virus magically mutated.

Comment Re:The Worst Reviews EVER (Score 1) 176

Here is the Advanced Praise section of a book called, "In the Wake of the Willows". It is a sequel to "The Wind in the Willows" set in New England and many of the characters did not seem to appreciate the author:

“A squid could have inked a better book, and it would have smelled a whole lot better.” -- Haggis McBadger

“You are sure to see this book in the newspapers, literally, after it has been pulped and turned into newsprint.” -- The Tidewater Beacon

“Since I am a literary agent, my job is to reject manuscripts, thousands and thousands of them. These submissions quickly become a blur, but Mr. Thurber’s manuscript was so painfully bad that it stood out from the slush pile. It was with immense pleasure that I sent him a tart rejection letter. Imagine my shock and horror when I found this abomination at a local book store.” -- Noelle A. Vail, Sisyphus Literary Agency

Comment The Worst Reviews EVER (Score 2) 176

Here is the Advanced Praise section of a book called, "In the Wake of the Willows". It is a sequel to "The Wind in the Willows" set in New England and many of the characters did not seem to appreciate the author (Frederick Thurber): “A squid could have inked a better book, and it would have smelled a whole lot better.” -- Haggis McBadger “You are sure to see this book in the newspapers, literally, after it has been pulped and turned into newsprint.” -- The Tidewater Beacon “Mr. Thurber should be ashamed of himself for such a scurrilous and contemptible depiction of my dear grandfather, Mr. Toad.” --Baroness Raquel Toad, Westport Point, Massachusetts “The author of this book should be condemned for promoting and glorifying the scandalous sport of croquet. This book can only serve to promote the moral decay of our community.” -- T Rev. Cotton Mather III “Mr. Thurber: You might have imagined your libelous depiction of my client’s family to be amusing, but my client did not. You repeated the outrageous and discredited claim that his weasel relatives had been convicted of overdue library books, but there are no records for this baseless and defamatory claim, never mind their other heinous crimes such as mismatched socks, jay walking, split infinitives, bad breath, and appalling table manners. See you in court!” -- Peevish Weasel III, Esq. “Lies, lies, damnable lies.” -- Portly Otter III “Since I am a literary agent, my job is to reject manuscripts, thousands and thousands of them. These submissions quickly become a blur, but Mr. Thurber’s manuscript was so painfully bad that it stood out from the slush pile. It was with immense pleasure that I sent him a tart rejection letter. Imagine my shock and horror when I found this abomination at a local book store.” -- Noelle A. Vail, Sisyphus Literary Agency “Upon reading this book, I felt betrayed. After we had extracted a solemn promise from Mr. Thurber to protect our privacy, he gleefully penned a tawdry exposé. His scurrilous and mendacious interpretation of our history has made a mockery of our community.” -- Marten Fisher, The Riverside Historical Society

Slashdot Top Deals

Disc space -- the final frontier!

Working...