Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment What is Apples comment on this issue? (Score 1) 391

It would be a really good idea for Apple's PR department to go forward and make some form of public statement about what the company intends to do with this patent. Otherwise, if this story becomes more widely known, it could easily cast a bad light on Apple in the public opinion.

Do you copy, Mr Employee-At-Apple-PR-department By-chance-reading-Slashdot?

Comment Re:First in a long line I hope! (Score 1) 822

Out of curiosity, what makes you opposed to the modern iteration of nuclear reactors? The major accidents have all been Mark I reactors, which have been known to be unsafe since 1972 (warnings ignored, thank GE in the U.S.). For modern reactors, "real science" reveals mostly positives, with almost no chance of a critical meltdown.

Well, as you wrote: "almost no chance...". The thing is, the probability estimates in this regard have a habit of turning out wrong; somehow something comes up that was not included in the estimate. In Chernobyl, well, it was a Russian plant, well, of course communists can't build proper plants. In Fukushima, it was either (a) the reactor design is outdated, or (b) the scale of the natural disaster was so unexpectedly large.

What will it be next time? How about maybe, "My bad, the reactor design was absolutely safe, but of course we didn't anticipate a terrorist attack / software glitch in the controls / human error."

I think it is not too convincing to keep hearing, "of course, in the past we were too stupid to prevent such disasters, but now we got the hang of it, honest"

Comment Re:By coincidence... (Score 1) 822

You forgot several cost terms:
  1. probability of catastrophic failure times damage when failure occurs
  2. cost of long-term depositing, containment and securing of radioactive waste (no suitable storage places found as of yet AT ALL)
  3. cost of dismantling plants after decommision

All of these externalities (and maybe some more I have not thought of) should be factored into the price. But they are not.

I honestly don't know how the figures would work out then, but the Germans may be correct in recognizing this.

Comment Re:Infected with moles (Score 1) 426

And I forgot... you suggest "It was suggested that the people screaming might want them in THEIR countries" - you obviously refer to non-american countries. Why wouldn't they take these people?

Well, for one, because they aren't the ones who were illegally holding and torturing them for years on end. It's the duty of the wrongdoer to compensate. How about offering them one of your smaller states?

Comment Re:Infected with moles (Score 1) 426

No.

If they actually carry out illegal acts, prove so in a fair trial and jail them in a plain old prison. No five-star resort involved. If you can't, release them (or don't imprison someone you don't have any reasonable evidence against). No one is forcing you to hold anyone innocent.

You know, standard procedure if you have rule of law.

Comment Linux games and multiplayer (Score 1) 362

An aspect that has bothered me but isn't mentioned here yet is that lots of Linux games are multiplayer (or at least start to be developed that way). This is quite understandable, since it's easier to get the basic game mechanics running if you don't have to care about either AI or write a story. However, I don't like multiplayer that much for reasons already stated here (repetitive gameplay, griefers, time investment to leave noob stage). Alas, very few interesting games remain, if you don't want ancient ones like "Return of the Amazon Queen" or the 100th Sokoban clone. There are some exceptions like rocksndiamonds and Battle of Wesnoth, but most games that at first seem interesting to me turned out to be multiplayer-only. Alas, I mostly don't bother checking the "games" section in the package manager anymore...

Comment Re:Form over function (Score 1) 418

Only if all states would be necessary for a simulation. Non-random information (needed for a simulation) can generally be represented using less (compressed) information, and the universe is apparently not "random", but exhibits a great deal of structure. I do not mean to say that simulation would be possible, but I think your argument does not prove otherwise.

Comment Re:Riiiight. (Score 1) 882

Well, in Germany it would be against the law to change early. It has been shown that driving till the end, and then merging as "one from the left lane, one from the right lane" is the most efficient way to handle ending lanes. Therefore the law demands that. It's called "Reissverschlussverfahren" ("zipper procedure").

Now that is an evil word.

Cop: I charge you 20 Euros for violation of the ... REISSVERSCHLUSSVERFAHREN!

Comment Re:Do the right thing... (Score 1) 1108

Eliminate dependence on foreign oil, and it also means we don't have to spend billions sending our kids off to die every time the Middle East hicups. How does THAT trash the economy?

Ever heard of the military-industrial complex? Hmmm...

"It is difficult to estimate the degree of dependence of the U.S. economy on its military and defense spending, but it is clearly enormous, and legislators fiercely resist defense cuts that affect their districts." (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_industrial_complex)

Slashdot Top Deals

All Finagle Laws may be bypassed by learning the simple art of doing without thinking.

Working...