Comment What is Apples comment on this issue? (Score 1) 391
Do you copy, Mr Employee-At-Apple-PR-department By-chance-reading-Slashdot?
Do you copy, Mr Employee-At-Apple-PR-department By-chance-reading-Slashdot?
Out of curiosity, what makes you opposed to the modern iteration of nuclear reactors? The major accidents have all been Mark I reactors, which have been known to be unsafe since 1972 (warnings ignored, thank GE in the U.S.). For modern reactors, "real science" reveals mostly positives, with almost no chance of a critical meltdown.
Well, as you wrote: "almost no chance...". The thing is, the probability estimates in this regard have a habit of turning out wrong; somehow something comes up that was not included in the estimate. In Chernobyl, well, it was a Russian plant, well, of course communists can't build proper plants. In Fukushima, it was either (a) the reactor design is outdated, or (b) the scale of the natural disaster was so unexpectedly large.
What will it be next time? How about maybe, "My bad, the reactor design was absolutely safe, but of course we didn't anticipate a terrorist attack / software glitch in the controls / human error."
I think it is not too convincing to keep hearing, "of course, in the past we were too stupid to prevent such disasters, but now we got the hang of it, honest"
All of these externalities (and maybe some more I have not thought of) should be factored into the price. But they are not.
I honestly don't know how the figures would work out then, but the Germans may be correct in recognizing this.
Well, for one, because they aren't the ones who were illegally holding and torturing them for years on end. It's the duty of the wrongdoer to compensate. How about offering them one of your smaller states?
If they actually carry out illegal acts, prove so in a fair trial and jail them in a plain old prison. No five-star resort involved. If you can't, release them (or don't imprison someone you don't have any reasonable evidence against). No one is forcing you to hold anyone innocent.
You know, standard procedure if you have rule of law.
"Bahn" means "train"
No, it means "way". Although you can shorten the word "Eisenbahn" (train) to "Bahn" (like you can shorten "hard drive" to "drive" in a computer context even if "drive" alone means, well, "drive").
Well, in Germany it would be against the law to change early. It has been shown that driving till the end, and then merging as "one from the left lane, one from the right lane" is the most efficient way to handle ending lanes. Therefore the law demands that. It's called "Reissverschlussverfahren" ("zipper procedure").
Now that is an evil word.
Cop: I charge you 20 Euros for violation of the
We should be better than that
or
We think we are better than that
fixed that for you.
Eliminate dependence on foreign oil, and it also means we don't have to spend billions sending our kids off to die every time the Middle East hicups. How does THAT trash the economy?
Ever heard of the military-industrial complex? Hmmm...
"It is difficult to estimate the degree of dependence of the U.S. economy on its military and defense spending, but it is clearly enormous, and legislators fiercely resist defense cuts that affect their districts." (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_industrial_complex)
All Finagle Laws may be bypassed by learning the simple art of doing without thinking.