I know he admitted the first video was staged, but most of the reactions this time around appear to be just as staged. Also, I don't think you can post videos of people in their home to your channel without their permission; their home is not a 'public setting' and as such even criminals maintain an expectation of privacy in this instance.
Part of the footage used in the original video came from fake thieves who where friends of the volunteers that put the package outside their porch without the knowledge of Mark Rober. All footage that came from those instances are removed from the original video as soon as he was made aware of the issue. It was outside his control so claiming that he did this is oversimplification of the issue. In the end quite a few real thieves where caught by his glitterbomb not all instances providing usable footage.
Like he did the first time?
Part of the footage used in the original video came from fake thieves who where friends of the volunteers that put the package outside their porch without the knowledge of Mark Rober. All footage that came from those instances are removed from the original video as soon as he was made aware of the issue. It was outside his control so claiming that he did this is oversimplification of the issue. In the end quite a few real thieves where caught by his glitterbomb not all instances providing usable footage.
The last time they did this it was fake and the thieves were actually friends of the guy. This is nothing but a paycheck for his channel.
Part of the footage used in the original video came from fake thieves who where friends of the volunteers that put the package outside their porch without the knowledge of Mark Rober. All footage that came from those instances are removed from the original video as soon as he was made aware of the issue. It was outside his control so claiming that he did this is oversimplification of the issue. In the end quite a few real thieves where caught by his glitterbomb not all instances providing usable footage.
Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (9) Dammit, little-endian systems *are* more consistent!