It's hot enough to boil a monkey's bum in here today, Bruce...

Let's see, what type of things other than picking up furniture and large appliances has this boomer done: - Build shed from scratch - Pour concrete footings - Rent excavator to do leach line repairs - Demolish bathroom and haul away - House full remodel - Kitchen remodel - Pick up large loads of rock, sand, compost, etc for garden. We won't count electrical work. What, you thought I live in the city or something?

Every day I drive to work and park in a lot filled with F-150 and similar pickup trucks driven by a single individual, and almost certainly only occasionally used for something you'd actually need a pickup truck for (most likely on weekends). I get that. It's annoying that all of the compact parking spaces are filled by monster-sized pickup trucks but a part of me understands. I haven't seen any data on aerodynamics that says it's a horrible design. Reduction of turbulence is complex and I'll wait to see some actual results. Reminds me of the F-117 Nighthawk. Ha, that could never have flown, could it? Is the Cybertruck built tough? Definitely seems that way, check. Seats six? Check. Dynamic air suspension? Check Can pull a 12,000 lb trailer with a small excavator? Check Built-in loading ramps? Check Retractable load cover? Check Extras like built-in air compressor and 120/220V AC? Check Think I'll order one. If I wanted a tough, practical truck that would work for any construction job I see myself doing, or just picking up the latest furniture purchase, that would fill the bill neatly. Oh, wait, I already did order one. The same people who said my Model 3 was a foolhardy order because Tesla could not possibly produce will be saying the same thing about the Cybertruck. It has become a source of amusement. I'm watching with amusement as all the articles shift from "Tesla killer" to "Cybertruck killer". Let the FUD games begin!

As other commenters have pointed out, the mean is going to be heavily skewed by high-income outliers such as CEOs. For anyone in a STEM field there is a point where we consider switching to a management track vs. remaining on a technical track. Switching to management leads to potentially higher earnings but as you "climb the ladder," or, rather, the pyramid, there is increasing competition for fewer management positions. Staying on a technical track means continuously updating your skill base and focusing on positions where the depth of your skill base as a senior technical person is worth more. At the end of the day it comes down to what is more rewarding for you. And, of course, a deeper skill base means you have become better at solving problems.

I've heard a lot about "soft skills" and "team building" and "collaboration" in companies that seek to make technical skills into a commodity job which can be filled from a relatively mediocre applicant base. Communication and the ability to work well with others are a major part of any good STEM skill set but they are no substitute from a detailed analytical ability to dive into difficult technical problems.

My conclusion is that in a post-industrial economy, science, math and engineering skills will become only more in demand, and smart companies will find that hiring management leadership roles works better with people who have a technical background rather than bean counters with Ivy League MBAs.

Ah yes, let's encourage mediocrity by failing to reward good performance. All the self-promoting backstabbers, queue up for the limelight. Instead, why not focus on contributions by people who are not jerks? It's really not so terribly hard to weight negatively for jerk factor...

At 57 I keep reinventing myself after working as a software developer for 30-odd years. I keep my resume trimmed down to the last 20 years, and if that's too long screw 'em. I've been in embedded Linux for the last 10+ years which has a fair number of greybeards. When it's time to look for work I try to be energetic and knowledgeable. There are not many people around nowadays who have actually coded programming languages, debuggers, and maintained millions of lines in assembler. None of those are viable career paths nowadays but the insights and experience in computer science are invaluable. Being an old curmudgeon gives me a bit less patience when people get all religious about one-size-fits-all solutions. The best asset a software engineer has is flexibility and the ability to adapt to changing challenges with the right strategy for the job.

Reading their theoretical paper, it looks like they used the typical compression technologies used nowadays: QAM (quadrature amplitude modulation) and WDM (wave division multiplexing). http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/sta... Definitely an interesting development.

More important than distance is the amount of dB loss they are able to overcome. Any L1 photonic switching device will introduce a certain amount of insertion loss which equates to length (connectors, mirrors, mirrors, connectors). Being able to tolerate additional insertion loss doesn't just mean more length, it means you can introduce more layers of all-optical switching. Even using a single all-optical switch might introduce 2-2.5dB of insertion loss. If you increase the haul length you are opening the door for more all-optical switching. The amount of silicon-based processing to convert optical to electrical and back again (typical repeater) gets very expensive when you are talking about terabytes of data.

Interesting article but very light on details. I would love to read the actual paper but looks like it was published in Science. The actual press release here: http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/press... has slightly more info than the linked article. This link to the PDF from August 2014 with the theoretical basis is free: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/sta... It looks like they are boosting WDM signals so this would work with existing long-range infrastructure.

When I look at your resume ("you" meaning a potential candidate for a software engineer or EE position) the first thing I look for is experience: have you been recently doing the kind of stuff I expect you to do? Your education and other credentials are something I might expect you to list further down in your resume, not at the top; I disagree with those who suggest you hide the PhD, just don't put it at the top, otherwise I would think you're looking for a research position.

Some companies want a "scientist" type role with specialization in a particular area, say, physics or aerospace. But that never applies to computer science - CS doesn't really qualify you for a software engineering position, it just means you've studied the theory in depth.

In Europe a degree is a prerequisite for a high-end software engineering job, not so much in the US; I'd say perhaps 10% of companies in the private sector in the US actually require a degree, and most of those are in defense or in regulated industries such as medical devices or writing software for nuclear power plants. I'm aware of this because I lack even a bachelor's degree but have not had trouble finding well-paying software engineering jobs in the US.

Think about what the recruiter is looking for, assuming the recruiter is a technical manager or another software engineer; I want to know that you can do the job and hit the ground running. If it's an entry-level position with low salary, putting the PhD up there will indicate that your salary expectations are likely to be much higher. If it's not an entry-level position, the hiring manager will want to see in the first 5 seconds or so that you are already experienced in doing the job he or she is looking for.

Also job boards have become next to useless other than getting you on mailing lists for "URGENT JOB OPENING in Boise Idaho for person with 10+ years experience, pays up to $25/hr..." Some companies are still advertising jobs there but most good positions are hired through recruiters. Start with updating your resume and slant it toward experience rather than credentials. It's always good to spend time talking to recruiters once you've gotten the sense they're not the bottom-feeders who are looking for butts to fill seats. That's called networking...

The other thing that works against you is not being currently employed. It sounds really stupid but that's the reality: if you are already employed you are more desireable, if you are out of work some employers think it means there may be something wrong with you. Find a startup you'd like to work for then work on an open source project that requires the skills they want, then market your skills based on open source experience (with commits and projects on Github / SourceForge etc)

Why do bus owners and operators in the litigation-happy US of A need cameras mounted in buses? So when someone thinks they can profit from an injury lawsuit by having a shyster lawyer claim they were injured because the driver took a corner too fast, and typically these things are timed so that the letter from the ambulance-chasing lawyer comes 18 months or more after the alleged injury, the bus owner and/or operator has a leg to stand on and say, "see, the driver was not pulling donuts and nobody fell over so how could this person have broken his/her collarbone?" Cases like this are common - I used to work for a company that made such devices and this was one of the big reasons for having inside cameras. The other reason was having an outside camera that could exonerate (or lay blame) on the driver in an actual accident. This is not a big brother survellance issue or a "we want exclusive video cos we're greedy" issue, it's a safety and KYA issue... Ride on a bus and your picture is taken and if you don't like it, blame it on rampant sue-for-profit inflated lawsuits. Not wanting people to take pictures on the bus can be a privacy concern. Sounds like a dual standard on the face of it but not so much if you look at it in depth...

If you are going stricly based on hashing (e.g. not trying to match images that may have different EXIF data embedded, thus making the hashes different) fslint works quite well. It will chug through a filesystem and basically wraps python commands to compare by hash and file size (using both md5 and sha256) and will give you a report of wasted space. You can then save a parseable plain text file. It can take a while - it's bandwidth-bound as you might expect - I just did this for a 2tb network share and it took over 12 hours. But it got the job done and all I had to do was sudo apt-get install fslint

It sounds very much like a scam my wife experienced. I can't figure out what they mean to get out of it but it is not legitimate. We had these calls for weeks, at all hours of the day and night, asking for someone who's never had this number (not in the last few years). On several occasions I asked who are you trying to collect this debt for? And the answer was, The Lending Club. I contacted the Lending Club and was promptly answered by a guy in their fraud department, who was very helpful, and told me they do not employ any debt collection services operating out of India using spoofed caller ID. He said this is fairly common and gave me contact numbers for the FCC and FBI. Unfortunately there's not much that can be done. She ended up changing her Vonage number. I strongly suspect that had I ever asked the question "what do I have to do to make these calls stop?" the answer would be something like "just give us your credit card information and we'll put a one-time charge for (fill in some two-figure number)" It's robodialling with operators who get put on the line when someone appears to answer and they are probably getting paid next to nothing. I can't come up with any other conclusion given the facts in my case. It's possible this is the same..

2 weeks is customary even if the company might end up acting badly. I have not had a single job in the last 20 years where the company would give a reference other than "yes he worked here for these dates and his job title was such and such."
When the corporate world was taken over by lawyers and HR policy focused on not getting sued, most companies took the safe approach to references, because even a good reference becomes a "bad" reference when someone doesn't get the good reference they thought they deserved.
My coworkers, on the other hand, have always been the people I turn to for references. Companies never give references but they always want them from you, and they want them to talk about you in great detail. Nowadays everyone asks for multiple references even before the job is on the table (record number needed = 10!).
All that I have to offer those (usually) former coworkers, bosses and colleagues is to do the same favor for them, and to do them the courtesy of giving 2 weeks' notice when it's time to move on.

At least in the US, I've found that only a small minority of companies consider education a real requirement. Most listings require "Bachelor's / Master's degree or equivalent experience." I'm over 50 and still on an active technical track. My education is a GED. I don't have trouble getting in the door. My resume doesn't mention education; if an application asks for it I tell them. If I think it might be an issue because the listing says "degree required" and doesn't mention "or equivalent experience" I'll raise it up front and just ask if my thirty years of professional experience (I only keep the last 15 or so on my resume usually) counts for more than whether / if I have a degree. The companies that do consider education a requirement for someone with impressive accomplishments and skills are probably not places you'd want to work for. Headhunters and corporate recruiters can't do much more than match keywords usually, so if your skill set is up to date and you can leverage your experience by being a really good generalist I think it goes a long way. Europe and Asia are a different ballgame altogether, but in the US experience still counts for far more than anything else, especially in technology. Just look for the companies that want people who can do things and show them that's who you are...