Why did GM write into their bail-out a few years ago the clause that they cannot be held responsible for malfeasance which occurred prior to that bail out?

Makes me sick thinking about it.

How much of this has to be revealed before the general population in America cares enough to do something about it?

As an American, I worry.

I have the Disable Ads box checked. Technical glitch?

Bobby Knight would seem to be the obvious chair-throwing choice in coaches.

With this I feel now more than ever that my job isn't nearly as fun as it should be.

We all know that the police generally don't put a high priority on retrieving lost smart phones. So, if someone ever absconds with my smart phone and I use the app that I have on it to track it down, I will simply call the local sheriff's office and tell them that I have located my phone, give them the address, and tell them that in 10 minutes I will be going in locked and loaded to retrieve it. That should give them sufficient time to prevent a more serious crime from taking place.

So then what you are saying is having an expensive camera doesn't automatically make someone an expert video camera operator?

Drones in the private sector are getting to the point where the only way to really resolve some of this dangerous behavior is to require operators of the drones that go over a set height take classes and get some sort of certification. I don't know aviation enough to know what height that would be.

It can be a fun hobby, but if they aren't flown responsibly and safely, eventually a mid-air collision with a helicopter is going to cause a fatality. At least with proper training it would lessen the chances of that.

Just before Mother's Day, so many a geek can go see Grandma and kill two birds with one stone.

They traditionally haven't paid much attention to the law, so I'm not certain that they would do much different here.

When companies pick and choose their statistics so blatantly and make a claim like this, it really makes me trust the company that much less.

One of the places where the Internet truly succeeds is by giving everyone a voice, thereby creating a watchdog effect that mass media has failed at themselves. Granted, not many use their "voice" for a worthy purpose, but those that do may never have been heard if it weren't for this medium.

Funny coming from someone who does a show of that name. It's just pretend anarchy.

Wouldn't a RaspberryPI be cheaper and do the same thing?

I seriously doubt that.