Comment Re:You can't always eject first on Mac (Score 1) 521
Comment Re: yes, (Score 2) 521
Comment Re: What could possibly go wrong? (Score 1) 370
The initial papers were published from Stanford, quite a few years ago (and so are hidden form the internet).
http://www.cs.ubc.ca/~lowe/keypoints/ Here's a page for SIFT, and early image keypoint detector
Comment Re: Why would you want this? (Score 1) 132
Unicode. Itâ(TM)ll happen to you one day.
Well, it still hasn't happened to Slashdot
Comment Re:Go ahead, get rid of the 'phone jack... (Score 1) 332
Next time, I trust you'll spot the warning signs earlier and bow out before it's too late.
Ransomware Infects a Hotel's Key System (dailymail.co.uk) 203
UPDATE: The hotel's managing director has clarified today that despite press reports, "We were hacked, but nobody was locked in or out" of their rooms.
Comment Re:This is stupid (Score 4, Insightful) 161
Comment lolz (Score 1) 88
"they couldn't secure financing for manufacturing and shipping the first batch of units"
If only we had a way to provide funding for products? We could set up websites that enabled people to post commercially unviable ideas, collect sales in advance, and then bullshit for two years about why they haven't shipped, promised features have been removed, etc.
Comment Fires first, due to high O2 levels (Score 1) 119
We'd have problems with fires - which would get massive - before we had problems with crops dying off due to lack of CO2. Also, the ocean's pH would change and that'd be quite bad news indeed.
Comment My host is the router (Score 1) 140
Comment Re: Old school reflective lcd (Score 2) 294
Comment It is racist, and has been debunked (Score 1) 314
> As an example, you say that this study from a Canadian university is racist and has been debunked extensively, which is clearly total bullshit.
The study was published in "Intelligence", which is a journal for the "International Society for Intelligence Research."
A quick google for "International Society for Intelligence Research racist" shows that recipients of it's "lifetime achievement award" and board members are widely criticized as promoting junk science, white supremacy, and furthering nazi concepts on race.
Let's take a look at some examples.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/new...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
According to sociocultural anthropologist Francisco Gil-White, in publishing studies financed by the Pioneer Fund, Linda Gottfredson is part of a concerted effort to legitimize racist ideology through pseudo-science, together with an assortment of other people with inadequate or completely missing scientific qualifications for studying human intelligence"
Rushton has been discredited for over thirty years and he's viewed as nothing more than pseudo-science fuel for white supremacists like you.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
And his co-author on that paper? An idiot who thinks racists like him are "the next galileos." https://www.google.com/search?...
He's so desperate to spread his bullshit that he paid to have a booklet about his work mailed to professors around the country
Comment Rushton is a known and discredited racist (Score 3, Insightful) 314
Rushton is a racist - this is both well known and extensively documented by comments he's made publicly and white supremacy publications he's contributed to. His science is beyond junk.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
The man has been repeatedly and thoroughly discredited scientifically as ignoring evidence that doesn't fit his prejudices, his testing methods as biased against black people, and using non-equivalent groups.
He was president of an institute classified as a hate group. He speaks routinely at eugenics conferences and has published articles in white supremacy magazines and online websites.