Comment Woops (Score 1) 565
Comment So if one was to search for... (Score 1) 136
Comment Wow, 1200 man hours!?!?! (Score 1) 460
Comment Damn it, that's GNU Henry Spencer (Score 2) 79
Comment Re:It's kind of a - umm, no shit - statement, (Score 1) 361
Reality shows us, 99.999999% of the value is in the implementation of the idea, the idea is nearly worthless.
Obvious solutions are only obvious after they have been solved. The fact that I can explain how an incandescent lightbulb works, a semiconductor, nuclear fusion and fission, does not put me on the level of the giants (and teams of giants) who made those discoveries. Those discoveries were made from deliberate acts of innovation that Linus declares to be bullshit and you declare to be worthless. Who gives a shit about incrementalism. Of course all discovery is built on the foundations of prior discovery, I fail to see how that somehow devalues actively engaging in innovation.
You know, I can make perfect implements of all of those things every day for the rest of my life. I can sing the shit out of a Bon Jovi song. But no one will remember me for my perfect implementation of someone else's ideas. Because we all know that someone reasonably skilled could have done what I did.
To believe that having a solid grasp of the theory of relativity makes you equal to Einstein with respect to net value to the world, is the sheer epitome of hubris. 98%+ of those ideas fail not because the implementation was bad, but because they were bad ideas in the first place. I certainly concede that a good idea without a good implementation will have no realized value. But good ideas are HARD to come by. Implementing good ideas is just work, not to be diminished and certainly of value, but the implementation is rarely the thing of scarcity that leads to intrinsic value.
Comment Oh FFS (Score 1) 218
When was the last time you went and performed static and/or dynamic code analysis and performance profiling to fully optimize the toUpper function of the String class that you wrote in order to squeeze 3 more clocks cycles over the version provided with your SDK.
But that seems to be the question that most are reacting to. This was not a question about premature optimization, we all (hopefully) understand the problems with that. But if you don't consider computational complexity when coding until it becomes a problem, then you have no business being paid for your work. Period.
Comment There is an easy solution (Score 1) 472
Comment Re:How valuable is trade? (Score 1) 73
Are China and other countries gaining ground? Sure they are. But the sky most definitely is still up there, mon petit poulet.
Comment Re:Again With This Asshole? (Score 1) 73
This is an expletive sentence structure, and "a whole lot of folks just south of the border with a hole lot [sic] artillery aimed up their noses" is the complete subject.
The South part clearly refers to the South Koreans, unless you are from Australia. Not because North and South are different there, but because they allow Barnaby Joyce to continue to hold office under the guise of protecting animals and thus might be expected to get things diametrically incorrect.
You are correct though that "they" in the second sentence refers to the subject of the first sentence, you just misidentify the subject.
Props for using the correct form of "you're" though, that's not common for folks who refuse to issue a mea culpa after they are called on being so clearly and incontrovertibly incorrect.
Remember, sometimes it is better to remain silent and be thought a fool...