The issue with stopping parents rights the second a child's health is put at risk, is that it invites over officious idiocy from child services, like "oh my god, I saw some snot dribbling from their nose once, therefore you're not cleaning them regularly enough, and their health is at risk!"
Fortunately, not everything has to be a slippery slope.
"It has to become socially unacceptable to admit to another human being that you are VPNing into U.S. Netflix"
I am Canadian. I occasionally vpn into a US server to watch US netflix. Heck, I've even vpn'ed into European countries just to see what they get. I have never sat in the penalty box for 2 minutes to feel shame.
Generally, though, I stick to Canadian netflix because it's good enough and it's a wee bit of a hassle to vpn to a US server. It's only a wee hassle. Don't go telling me how easy it is. I get it. It's just clicking a couple of buttons.
your post is a little tl;dr for me, so forgive me if I'm focusing on the wrong details here.
But:
"scientism claims that life after death is impossible"
Science makes no such claims. "Science" would say that there's no credible evidence of life after death therefore it probably doesn't exist. Should credible evidence arise, "science" will re-evaluate.
unfortunately, at some point, technology cannot overcome human stupidity. You have to do best practise type stuff for the majority of the cases, then deal with the outliers manually.
The US is the only western country not to provide some sort of healthcare...and you think everybody else is wrong.
I'll be sure to throw you a couple of bucks when you get sick and lose everything and become homeless. Just make sure you have a witty cardboard sign. I like those.