Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Help with research. (Score -1) 21

Habeas Corpus problems created by GWB. search, yields this. Believe it or not, if GWB or other US agents lable you an "enemy combatant" they can do to you what Guantanamo bay does to it's detainies every day. Yes, that applies to US citizens and goes beyond more common police harassment and abuse. If you want the US government to treat you with respect, you must demand that the US governement treat everyone with respect.

The same search also yeilds this dignified objection to US torture, but I'm sure you want a more qualfied legal opinion for depravity. The fact that other administrations have tortured people is reason to denounce previous administrations, not forgive the administration that wrote a twisted, 81 page legal handbook to justify everything short of murder. John Yoo is a lawyer, so it must be right eh? He wrote the manual in 2002, because news of torture was leaking out and Yoo defended it again in 2006. The ultimate justifications used against "enemy non combatants", "terrorists" and bandits is much like those used by people the US hung for war crimes 60 years ago. [search 1 2.

Even someone like you, who seems to be so easily distracted by Christmas tree orniments, could fail to see the destruction of their first amendment rights to free speech and peaceful protest. Didn't you see protesters at both Democratic and Republican national conventions locked in caged "free speech zones"? What's more damning is the arrests made before the last Republican Convention on the basis of infiltrators, wiretaps and other obvious political harrassment.

If arresting peaceful protesters based on what they think is not retaliation enough for you, there are other stories of patriotic citizens being added to the "no fly list" for their opinions. Try this Korean war veteran and Princeton professor of public law. Think he hates his fellow Americans? No, he hates the above crimes that violate the Constitution he swore to defend.

Most retaliatory punishment can not be directly attibuted to people in the Bush administration, but that administration is the father of all of them by the tone and example set. Leaders should understand that their followers will overshoot their examples in horrible ways. You can't have a little "discomfort" torture, you will always get murder when you lose respect for your prisoners. You can't have a little blacklist, it will always be abused in novel ways by people you are not aware of. You can't have a little uncotroled wiretapping, you will always get dignity destroying invasion of privacy and business destroying uncertainty in communications. Respect for your fellow man is the cornerstone of civil society. It is clear Mr. Bush lacked respect for his fellow citizens and the citizens of other countries. The result is lawless behavior.

Comment Hate or Constitutional issue, this is not. (Score -1) 21

Remember GWB calling the Constitution "just a piece of paper"? No? That matters less than warrantless wiretaps, bidless contracts, torture, elimination of habeas corpus and a dozen other things GWB has done to rape your rights.

By the same token, your artist is a patriot. Someone who does not care would never have bothered, especially when people say that the Bush administration retaliates in every way it can. You should not try to stretch these kinds of feelings into "hatred" like Andrew Jackson had for the British Crown. For all their spying, GWB people did not do their homework about this artist and should not have asked in the first place.

Comment Bad waking dreams. (Score -1) 684

Where I put my keys is not important, that's why I have one place to put them. There are many other cribs like this because I did not want to make the same mistake I did when I was 18.

Cell phone in the fridge? I suppose the fridge might keep you from hearing it scream or something. Young or old, that's all you Mr. LSD.

Comment Re:Growing up, not older. (Score -1) 684

The truely wise learn Unix at a young age. When they are older, they can replace their younger peers with small shell scripts.

Application - do not tempt older, apparently slower, peers to show you their crib sheets. Just watch and learn as the job gets done.

Comment Novell is Evil because M$ is Evil. (Score -1) 360

Novell certainly isn't "in bed with Microsoft"

True, M$ keeps it's "one night stands" in a cage so they can't run away. M$ indeed broke and destroyed Novell, now what's left has been turned against the free software community a-la SCO. Instead of going the free software route, M$ executives took $350 million of M$'s money to line their pockets. Management has gone as far as to favor M$ Windows in their advertising and on their web site, yes they have pages that don't work outside of IE. Novell managment betrayed the free software community, Suse and every Novell employee that did not get a large enough piece of the blood money. The bad publicity and even worse choice of technology is going to run Novell into the ground the same way SCO was run into the ground. They are now a M$ shell and will soon be nothing but a litigation machine.

Comment Anti-Trust Shits on all of us. (Score 2, Interesting) 314

Stickers that changed from "Vista Capable" to "Designed for XP" on the day Vista shipped are sleazy, but the larger issue is worse: M$ KILLED INTEL'S GRAPHICS MARKET. What the hell was wrong with Vista that it could not do translucency on Intel chip sets? E16 has been doing translucency in 2D land for a decade, so Vista should have gracefully dealt with the few missing pieces in Intel's chip sets. I know that 3D gaming works well enough on the previous generation of Intel under GNU/Linux, and suspect that's the rub. M$ killed Intel's ambitious drive to produce graphics chipsets because Intel had released the drivers as free software. HP moved away before Vista shipped, but that was not enough to keep Vista from sucking on HP anyway. For daring once to do for free software what they routinely do for M$, Intel has been driven out of the graphics market. The "favor" of letting Intel sell a bunch of hardware for an OS that would never use it should be judged in this light.

Security

Safari "Carpet Bomb" Attack Code Released 118

snydeq writes "A hacker has posted attack code that exploits critical flaws in the Safari and Internet Explorer Web browsers. The source code can be used to run unauthorized software on a victim's machine, and could be used by criminals in Web-based computer attacks, security experts say. The public example of the attack code allows attackers to litter a victim's desktop with executable files, an attack known as 'carpet bombing.' In combination with bugs in Windows and Internet Explorer, attackers can run unauthorized software on a victim's computer."
Microsoft

Submission + - EU calls for use of open standards

fondacio writes: In a speech that has been reported as taking a swipe at Microsoft, European Union Competition Commissioner Neelie Kroes has called for businesses and governments to use software based on open standards. While not mentioning Microsoft by name, Ms Kroes referred to the fact that "[t]he [European] Commission has never before had to issue two periodic penalty payments in a competition case" until this happened to Microsoft, and also referred to other pending cases. Most of the things she told a conference in Brussels will not come as a surprise to Slashdot readers, but it may be considered encouraging to hear the following quotes from someone in her position:

"Where interoperability information is protected as a trade secret, there may be a lot of truth in the saying that the information is valuable because it is secret, rather than being secret because it is valuable. [...] we should only standardise when there are demonstrable benefits, and we should not rush to standardise on a particular technology too early. [...] I fail to see the interest of customers in including proprietary technology in standards when there are no clear and demonstrable benefits over non-proprietary alternatives. [...] standardisation agreements should be based on the merits of the technologies involved. Allowing companies to sit around a table and agree technical developments for their industry is not something that the competition rules would usually allow. So when it is allowed we have to look carefully at how it is done."
Ms Kroes also mentions the criticism of software patents, and the company she does mention by name is Apple. Her speech can be found here in the open PDF and HTML formats and the proprietary Word format.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Everybody is talking about the weather but nobody does anything about it." -- Mark Twain

Working...