Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter


Forgot your password?
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 Internet speed test! ×

Comment Re: Positive (Score 0) 316

I like how the socialists automatically think the reason for any monopoly is because of an <i>underregulated</i> system. Not one that is so overburdened and over-regulated that it is impossible to start a tractor company without millions of dollars in lawyers, startup costs, labor expenses, and compliance expenses. If me and three buddies wanted to build and sell tractors without any of that, they would lock us up in jail. That is socialism, not capitalism.

Comment Re:No, that's not illegal, in public. Same as driv (Score 1) 107

Yep people are naive. Anyone with an aircraft could simply open the window and stick a DSLR out and zoom right in on your backyard. Unlike a "drone" you're going to have no idea it's happening because the person is 2+ miles away and using a zoom lens.

Sure, the barrier to entry has gone down, and unfortunately some really irresponsible people are able to buy something at Walmart and use it to mess with others. But generally speaking, the pandoras box was opened a long time ago. We live in three dimensions and people 'ought to make peace with that new reality.

Comment Not all that effective (Score 1) 62

What if said drone navigates via an INS and gyros, and isn't controlled from the ground but via a pre-programmed flight plan? It sounds like this defense, while probably effective against your average DJI Phantom bought at Walmart, will do nothing to deter someone motivated enough to use a drone as a weapon. Hell, it probably won't even work against drones that don't rely on GPS and are controlled on something other than 2.4Ghz.

Comment Re:China and South Korea and Russia can do it (Score 0) 88

Sure, obviously it isn't viable when the government front-loads it with thousands and thousands of regulations to cover the externalities of Nuclear power, when the government does no such thing with Solar or Wind (AKA non-base load generating power). Are they covering the recycling of silicon when they purchase thousands of solar panels? Are they considering the below minimum wage Chinese workers that work in toxic factories to produce your 'green' energy panels? Are they considering the wildlife impact of wiping out hundreds or thousands of square miles to generate a fraction of the energy of a nuclear power plant? The entire system as we know it is a lie, and as they say, turtles all the way down. The only reason things look good on paper is because people have manipulated the numbers for personal benefit.

Comment Re:Works better than expected (Score 1, Insightful) 363

Yes it is perfectly reasonable to make Holocaust jokes. It's another century, in case that isn't too obvious.

Are we going to outlaw jokes about the American Revolution? Jokes about the Ancient Egyptians? At what point are people not allowed to be offended by something that did not occur in your lifetime and is a part of the history books? This group above is not denying the Holocaust or Nazi-ism. It is a parody.

Comment Re:Regulations (Score 1) 62

I don't mean to be a contrarian or non-empathetic, but where I come from that's called 'personal responsibility'. Just as it is your responsibility not to set your hand on a hot stove, or not to leap off a cliff, or not to eat poisonous plants, it is your responsibility to conduct business with others who are reputable and safe.

Comment Not that complicated (Score 1) 435

Salary negotiation isn't really that complicated. Know what you're worth, what value you provide, what the industry is willing to pay for that value, and then ask for it without reservation. If, at that point, the potential employer or client is willing to negotiate within those parameters, take it under consideration and figure out what concessions or modifications to the contract you're willing to make to close the deal. It's no different than negotiating for a car, or a house, or anything else.

Comment Re:Trump is already a uniter (Score 1) 637

The argument for risk-reward analysis would otherwise be a unique idea if I hadn't heard it about a dozen times across Slashdot and liberal communities like Reddit. Unfortunately it's a misleading argument. In most states (i.e. California) there is absolutely no risk to voting fraudulently. Voters don't know it is even a law, because the voter registration system does not ask if you are a United States citizen. Community Outreach organizations are, if you pay attention to Project Veritas, with video evidence, literally bussing people to the polls. You can trust common sense- because common sense is that anyone against ID at the polls has an agenda.

Comment Re:And this will change nobody's minds.. (Score 1) 378

Farmers don't re-use seeds. You say it's "as old as agriculture itself" but the idea is patently false. Long before GMOs there were seed companies and seeds were purchased for a season. There's no conspiracy here; it's wildly inconvenient to collect seeds and re-plant them, and seeds have been sold in bulk for this purpose for the last 150+ years.

Comment Re:pretty poor science (Score 1) 349

What global warming means is new distribution fights for ressources.

We have had the ability to harness virtually unlimited nuclear energy since the 1950s. Argument 1 â" utterly debunked. If our survival depended on it I'm sure we could chuck a few hippies into the sea and get back on track with fission (As China is already doing on a massive scale). With recent advances in hydroponics and agricultural technology, I'd say we're on track to feed the world of tomorrow no sweat.

Even small, local climate changes by moving trade wind patterns caused civilisations to collapse, accompagnied by war, pandemics and devastation of large regions.

Civilizations have also collapsed over things such as: Taxes, Family Feuds, Middle Management, Bananas, Sexual Insecurity, Poor PR and more! Climate Change in this context is utterly irrelevant. Civilizations come and go all the time.

we face a global war, and we still have overkill capacity -- even if we don't use the nuclear arsenal.

Earth is more peaceful than it's ever been in the history of mankind. Food is cheap and abundant. We've built intelligent machines, travelled to the moon, split the atom, and (With the help of theUS, EU, downfall of USSR, globalization, Internet, etc.), have built a stable, interconnected world such as has never been seen. Why all the damned pessimism? For some reason going from horse and carriage to space travel in 100 years isn't good enough for you guys? I honestly don't get it and it's sad state of things that people have stopped dreaming about the future.

Comment Re:Yes, but no. (Score 1) 623

"Fire in a Crowded Theater" was made up in US vs Schenck to argue for the conviction of Charles Schenck, a socialist, because he argued against the draft in WWI. You know, back when we put those filthy socialists in jail, instead of letting them run for president.

I can tell you right off the bat that Fire in a Crowded theater ALSO does not apply as an "exception" to the first amendment. It has no legal standing whatsoever. You could go yell fire in a theater today, if you're feeling up to it, and I guarantee you won't be prosecuted for speech. You'll get arrested for disturbing the peace, perhaps, but it's a free country and you can say whatever you want unless it's BOTH intended to be malicious and blatantly, knowingly false. If you actually thought there was a fire, you would be in the clear, since our legal system operates on INTENT and not what is politically correct or not.

1st Amendment has no exceptions. The closest thing to an exception would be national security secrets (Which, ironically, is partially the fault of Trump's #1 opponent), which we are fighting passionately in the courts right now.

Comment Re:Talk to Vendors (Score 1) 219

We have actually purchased a NetApp cluster, replicated in two sites, and while I can't divulge what we paid (Plus I'm just the guy who set it up), there's a good chance the parent is off by almost an order of magnitude. Now &ndash; I'm not saying you couldn't build your own storage cheaper, or that I have my own issues with NetApp, or that some sort of Cloud solution might not be an even better answer- such as Amazon S3 or Glacier, I will say that a SAN is not at all a bad idea and depending on how important your data is, absolutely worth it. Synology makes great gear but they're in a completely different league compared to something like a NetApp and especially an EMC, just in terms of redundancy (redundant psus, redundant shelves, redundant controllers), support, and performance. It's the same reason banks spend millions to run mainframes even though a new smartphone is probably faster.

Comment Re:ISPs simply need to be regulated (Score 1) 338

Tom Wheeler may have connections and we might hate his guts but it's silly to think that the pittance he donated matters. Obama appointed him for political influence, not money. Money in politics isn't the problem, power is. Thinking that lobbyists buy votes is third grade logic. You sound like the people that claim we go to war for oil. It's a convenient lie for people that can't handle the more complex geopolitical power struggles that keep the system running.

The anti 'Corporate Personhood' argument is extremely misguided, dangerous idea. Corporations are fictitious entities composed of people. Anyone can start one. I have a right under the constitution to assemble a group of people and have my speech protected. What about nonprofits? What about industries that genuinely need their interests represented?

Shouldn't an American manufacturing company be able to lobby against trade agreements with outsourced third-world labor (e.g. China)?

The Supreme Court has ruled time and time again that the system is working as intended. If we take money out of politics the problem won't magically go away. Politicians will still be corrupt, wars will still be waged and the average American will still be thrown under the bus. The only difference is that we slide one step closer to tyranny. The solution isn't to take away money, it's to take away power. We need less government, not more.

Comment So much hype... (Score 2) 49

As someone who builds model aircraft, multirotors (aka 'drones'), and flies these things as a hobby -- man this video infuriates me.

These guys really think the FAA is going to let a business fly a flying projectile through the middle of San Francisco using Chinese-made hobby-grade equipment, with no formal airworthiness standards and no understanding of why we have federal airspace in the first place?
Who's going to be responsible when the thing loses a flight controller and it spins out of control into someone's car/house/child? This video is riddled with technical failings.

The worst part of this is a disturbing trend of: 'Hey, let's just ignore all the real-world problems and make a slick video'. Somewhere along the way, all these kids in San Francisco forgot that you need to put in effort before bragging about something.
We don't need social media affixed to toy helicopters, we need real engineering and hard work.

Slashdot Top Deals

The unfacts, did we have them, are too imprecisely few to warrant our certitude.