ObliviousMnd - Slashdot User

Comment Re: How about that (Score 0) 588

by ObliviousMnd on Thursday September 05, 2013 @11:21PM (#44771473) Attached to: Lowell Observatory Pushes To Name an Asteroid "Trayvon"

dark asteroid being followed by a sketchy comet. seems legit.

Comment Re:North Korea and Burma (Score 0, Flamebait) 182

by ObliviousMnd on Sunday January 08, 2012 @05:10AM (#38627930) Attached to: North Korean Nuclear Facilities, From 30,000 Feet

And remember that U.s. is still the only nation on planet to ever have used nuclear weapons. Against civilians, no less.

yes, its sad. we are a bunch of dicks for doing that...

Comment Re:Not bound by the statute of limitations? (Score 1) 395

by ObliviousMnd on Wednesday October 12, 2011 @04:10PM (#37694924) Attached to: NASA Sues Apollo Astronaut To Return Moon Camera

thats why i popped down here. not bound by statute. ridiculous!

Comment /. lags (Score 1) 738

by ObliviousMnd on Sunday October 17, 2010 @07:41PM (#33927238) Attached to: Humans Will Need Two Earths By 2030

i never realized how far behind the times /. was on these "science" articles. it is a week btw

Comment /. mistake (Score 2) 465

by ObliviousMnd on Thursday September 30, 2010 @05:01PM (#33752778) Attached to: Hawking: No 'Theory of Everything'

i don't agree with the last line of this, "The claim is a reversal for Hawking, who claimed in 1980 that there would be a unified theory by the turn of the century." He did NOT claim that physicists would discover a theory of everything, he simply asked what the chances were that physicists would find a complete unified theory of everything by the end of the century. It appears that there is a difference! Once again someone decided to skim read an article, or went off what they thought they remembered. way to go slashdot! rabble rabble rabble.

Slashdot Top Deals