It's gotten so far that some Republicans are trying to back away because they realize that those laws being used to censor "the left" could easily be used to censor them for the exact same reason. The big fun being to see how the Supreme Court will allow the censorship but then twist themselves into knots trying to deny the same rights if a (D) gets to be President.
You think the US is going to keep doing elections?
The US's pedophile president is committing war crimes in international waters, and deploying the military against his own country, and congress is holding hearings about UFOs? Didn't it just come out that Trump took military action against North Korea in his first term, and hid it from congress? What the fuck are they doing? I know under normal circumstances, a government can do multiple things at once, but it really feels like there are too many major issues to be doing shit like this right now.
It's almost like they're trying to make themselves look useless to justify their eventual dissolution.
When your opposition is a felon that is disliked by most people and your opposition still gets elected that should speak VOLUMES to the choice your party made for a candidate.
Does it, though? Can you actually articulate some concrete flaws about Kamala? There's plenty we can say about Trump: con-man, pathological narcissist, morally bankrupt, serial cheater, insurrectionist, rapist, pedophile, fascist, etc.. Republican apologists keep saying "Kamala was so bad, she lost to all that", but what, exactly, were the flaws that made Kamala less appealing than that?
Most often, if an external service is being used (e.g. for employee surveys), you first get a mail from internal address (that is also signed with corporate cert) that says something to the effect of "You'll be getting a mail over the next few days from SurveyPartner. The e-mail originates from @domain.com and it has a link to https://surveybox.something/ou... [surveybox.something] something".
This is the kind of content that should actually be in most phishing trainings.
There's no way someone who tries to use the resources available to the Federal Government to impose a dictatorship gets a happy ending.
Who's going to stop him? The supreme court that said nothing he does is illegal? Congress, who took an early vacation to shield him from an Epstein investigation?
demented halfwitted sociopathic president
Don't forget pedophile fascist.
European productivity is well behind America, and the gap is widening.
So what? It's not like American workers make more money by being more productive. Why not look at metrics that are actually related to people's lives? Poverty rate, infant mortality rate, life expectancy, quality of life, economic mobility, press freedom, literacy rate?
I know it's hard for capitalists to comprehend, but the economy isn't everything. It doesn't matter if a bunch of companies make a ton of money, if the government doesn't collect taxes off it, and spend that tax income on its people.
It's the political parties and media organizations who are out of touch with the silent majority.
What are you talking about? The Republicans are not "out of touch" with public opinion. They do not care about it. They are not attempting to represent the will of the people, they are imposing their own will upon the people.
What Canadians don't realize is that Americans think about Canada about as much as Canadians think about Mexico, which is to say, almost never.
Every Canadian I know expects that Americans are mostly unaware of anything happening outside of their own country.
This is why many conservatives objected to the BBB, as it continued and expanded deficit spending.
Which conservatives objected to the BBB, and didn't end up voting for it?
You had mail. Paul read it, so ask him what it said.