The display of shipping cost and import duties has been there for international customers for a long time. Time for US customers to catch up

Before jumping to embrace a framework, consider switching from an editor to an IDE. VSCode, Cursor or PyCharm come to mind (the vi vs Emacs debate is just hilarious). Poke around with AI like GitHub Copilot or Cursor to gain insight into improvement suggestions. Embrace version control (git) and automated deployment (e.g. GitHub Actions) I found CodeRabbitâs code reviews super helpful. Once you are there, take a hard look at your code. Since client side code is JavaScript, you could consider a JS framework like Vue - removes one language. Have a look and pick what works for you

The German car makers. They lost the will to actually survive

Their archives would be an AIâ(TM)s wonderland to feed on

Technically the website didnâ(TM)t share user information, but provided code (the font include) that made the userâ(TM)s browser âoeleakâ data. So the term âoesharingâ was interpreted very loosely. You can expect that to be subject of the appeal in an attempt to define that more narrowly. I could imagine browser manufacturers getting dragged into this as well - maybe a permission prompt like access to audio/video? If users then disable it for annoyance⦠Like in a good game there are a few layers to come: - OLG (appeals court) - BGH (Federal court) - EuGH (European court) We havenâ(TM)t seen the last of it

Nope. According to GDPR you (the website operator) need an agreement with the CDN about data processing that is compliant to the rules. Hard problem for free/anonymous CDNs.

When you dig into this -> the story doesnâ(TM)t check out and is a fact free propaganda piece including fake endorsement

Commonly known as: the outdoors with phone switched OFF

Look who is in the copyright alliance. Tells it all. Copyright was intended and designed as TEMPORARY exception to the higher public good. It should return to this

The fashion industry eclipses the music industry by more than a magnitude (that's more than 10x ). Sources: https://www.statista.com/stati... https://www.statista.com/outlo... How can that be? Fashion has NO copyright protection! That's the reason why e.g. Louis Vuitton prints their logo (which is a trademark) on all their goods. How it works, see here: https://www.ted.com/talks/joha... In conclusion: Ask your lawmakers to end copyright for music! It works for fashion, it will work for music. Keep the lawyers out of the creative process!

Nonsense. The only real answer to OK Boomer is a big laugh. And a hoodie: https://shop.spreadshirt.com/n...

Well researched news: The Economist Deep well of knowledge O'Reilly's Safari Make version control well: Github

Bio data is less "something - only you - know", but, after a few breaches, "something freely traded on black markets for anyone who pays to know"

Except being unable to change the "something you have" makes it easy to be compromised. Someone steals a password database or the 2FA key seeds, you reset them. You can't reset your bio data.

Matching bio data isn't an exact 1:1 match. The mechanism is a proximity comparison. So the original data can't be protected by a one way encryption. Therefore it is way easier to steal that information for reuse. After all any biometric reader attached to a personal device can be simulated by an attacker and the stolen bio data fed in directly - so it is even easier than any of the current 2FA (the use case for readers in protected locations, think doors, is only slightly better). In summary having a unchangeable second factor lowers security, especially when the second factor can't be protected properly #badidea