Comment Re:All these years... (Score 1) 25
- Why would your phone slow down? AI is used when you use it. When not, it doesn't do anything.
Apparently, OpenAI is already addressing this.
https://features.slashdot.org/...
Comment Re:Atari 2600 had 128 bytes of RAM (Score 1) 25
And the ROM only had 4K of addressable memory.
I hear what you're saying but let's be honest, Atari 2600 games had terrible, terrible graphics. Even back in the day, if your friends had something else, like a Mattel or a Colecovision, let alone a C64, you'd rather play them than your 2600. If you made Atari 2600 games today, nobody would play them. Aside from old retro geeks, the same guys who also insist on playing Mayfield's Star Trek.
But yes, the actual games were quite good and fun to play. More fun than many today.
Is AI Really to Blame for High Unemployment Among Recent Graduates? What Economists Say (npr.org) 51
47% of recent graduates say AI has already impacted hiring in their field, according to an April survey from ZipRecruiter.
"But is AI really the problem, or is it more complicated?" asks NPR. "Here's what economists have to say." According to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the unemployment rate for recent graduates — which it defines as 22-to-27-year-olds with a new bachelor's degree or higher — was 5.7% as of June, more than the rate for all workers, which stands at 4.1%... Stanford University economist Erik Brynjolfsson says AI is impacting the labor market for entry-level roles. "AI is not the whole story, but it's part of the story and the evidence is building," he says. Using payroll data, Brynjolfsson and his co-authors found that since late 2022 — when large language models like ChatGPT started popping up — early-career workers ages 22 to 25 in AI-exposed roles, like software developers and marketing managers, have experienced a 16% relative employment decline. In comparison, employment rates for older workers in AI-exposed fields and for all workers in jobs that aren't easily automated — like home health aides, physical therapists and construction workers — remained stable or have grown over that same time period... [Though he also says often when companies pull back on hiring, they cut junior roles first.]
Harvard University economist David Deming isn't convinced that AI is to blame for the challenging early-career job market. "If you look very carefully at the timing, it looks like the decline in junior hiring actually started a bit like six months before ChatGPT was released. And so what that tells me is it's something else," Deming says. "I think it's more like remote work." A recent analysis from the New York Fed found that companies are less likely to hire recent college grads into roles that can be done remotely. As remote jobs increased following the COVID-19 pandemic, so did unemployment among younger college grads, the New York Fed found. The analysis also found that AI didn't explain the rise in unemployment among younger workers and that remote work was more of a driving force... Employers hiring for remote jobs may be less likely to choose an entry-level candidate because it's harder to train them from afar... [And with remote positions, there's many more senior candidates to choose from.]
And here's another thing to consider: University of Chicago economist Anders Humlum says if AI were replacing entry-level jobs, you'd expect to see companies that rely heavily on AI to hire fewer workers. But that's not what the data shows. Humlum points to a study done by the financial accounting firm Ramp and the workforce research company Revelio Labs. The study examined AI spending and employee head count across more than 21,000 U.S. firms, from early 2021 to early 2026. It found that at companies making the largest AI investments, entry-level head count grew by 12% over the two years following AI adoption.
"But is AI really the problem, or is it more complicated?" asks NPR. "Here's what economists have to say." According to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the unemployment rate for recent graduates — which it defines as 22-to-27-year-olds with a new bachelor's degree or higher — was 5.7% as of June, more than the rate for all workers, which stands at 4.1%... Stanford University economist Erik Brynjolfsson says AI is impacting the labor market for entry-level roles. "AI is not the whole story, but it's part of the story and the evidence is building," he says. Using payroll data, Brynjolfsson and his co-authors found that since late 2022 — when large language models like ChatGPT started popping up — early-career workers ages 22 to 25 in AI-exposed roles, like software developers and marketing managers, have experienced a 16% relative employment decline. In comparison, employment rates for older workers in AI-exposed fields and for all workers in jobs that aren't easily automated — like home health aides, physical therapists and construction workers — remained stable or have grown over that same time period... [Though he also says often when companies pull back on hiring, they cut junior roles first.]
Harvard University economist David Deming isn't convinced that AI is to blame for the challenging early-career job market. "If you look very carefully at the timing, it looks like the decline in junior hiring actually started a bit like six months before ChatGPT was released. And so what that tells me is it's something else," Deming says. "I think it's more like remote work." A recent analysis from the New York Fed found that companies are less likely to hire recent college grads into roles that can be done remotely. As remote jobs increased following the COVID-19 pandemic, so did unemployment among younger college grads, the New York Fed found. The analysis also found that AI didn't explain the rise in unemployment among younger workers and that remote work was more of a driving force... Employers hiring for remote jobs may be less likely to choose an entry-level candidate because it's harder to train them from afar... [And with remote positions, there's many more senior candidates to choose from.]
And here's another thing to consider: University of Chicago economist Anders Humlum says if AI were replacing entry-level jobs, you'd expect to see companies that rely heavily on AI to hire fewer workers. But that's not what the data shows. Humlum points to a study done by the financial accounting firm Ramp and the workforce research company Revelio Labs. The study examined AI spending and employee head count across more than 21,000 U.S. firms, from early 2021 to early 2026. It found that at companies making the largest AI investments, entry-level head count grew by 12% over the two years following AI adoption.
Comment Re:I wonder⦠(Score 2) 95
I'm just wondering what this will do to their market value in the end. American cybersecurity companies are doing pretty well internationally; they are generally seen as highly competent, reliable (ok never mind Crowdstrike), and independent. With the U.S. government using them as an extension of the military to conduct hostile cyber operations, there's not a chance they will be considered to be independent anymore. In fact, they will be no better than Kaspersky. Will foreign companies and governments trust their security to a company that is known to be conducting U.S. government sanctioned hostile cyber operations? Worse yet, a company that could be conducting hostile cyber operations against their own country?
I'm not a prophet but as in so many recent executive decisions recently, the eventual long-term outcome could be something very different from what was expected and desired.
Comment Re:Who's Who? (Score 2) 125
Nearly everybody I know buys them for sheet music
Which is a whoops move. I brought a tablet exactly for that, a samsung. Almost none of the software standardised in the music industry for sheet music actually runs on android
For classical music, sheet music normally means (in ~95% of cases these days) PDFs from imslp.org. PDFs actually work quite well on Android tablets, and you can attach pedals to flip pages while playing.
You see that a lot in symphony orchestras these days, especially in amateur ones. (Professional orchestras may still prefer printed parts.)
Comment Re:Greybeards are evven older (Score 2) 79
The years of the old 8-bits like the VIC-20 and TRS-80 have started to wane
True but a slight understatement. C64 essentially killed off VIC-20. It did everything the VIC did but so much better that there was no practical reason to cling on to a VIC-20. (Aside from being morbidly addicted to a specific game cartridge.) Everyone were upgrading the first chance they got.
64KB ought to be enough for anybody, darnit.
Comment Re: Have you ever been able to buy the software? (Score 1) 154
Well, in the really old days this was it. You could "copy that floppy" and have your own pirate version of the software.
It was actually a bit more complicated. In many cases, the original install floppy served as your license 'token', and the software required it to be present in your floppy drive or the software wouldn't run. This was especially true for games.
Various tricks were used to make straightforward copying of the main install floppy ineffective. They usually involved nonstandard floppy disk formats, such as deliberate bad sectors, unusual data density, data outside the normal disk data range, etc. Many of these methods were used already for Commodore 64 games, and later adapted for Amiga, PC, etc., although serial number checks were sometimes used instead (esp. for business software), or even physical hardware 'dongles' that needed to be present while running the software.
But as is commonly known, the C64 years were also the golden age of binary hackers. They would invent a number of means to circumvent those devious copy protections. Low-level nibble copiers were widely circulated - mainly on floppy, and practically every C64 user had acquired one somewhere. Those copiers would make 'low-level' disk copies, ignoring the normal disk layout. Or you could 'dump' the memory image of a loaded game state where the copy protection check had already been passed. Of course real men would settle for nothing less than manually editing the game binary to work without a special disk.
Honestly, the last part was way above my meager skill but I occasionally had the privilege of watching a true artist at work. He would wade through pages and pages of hex dumps, immediately recognize the interesting calls, and then modify them...to disable copy protection, to give you infinite lives, to take you to the level/map of your choice, etc. Whatever you wanted in a game.
Needless to say, that guy went far.
Comment Re:good lord (Score 1) 46
Nethack has a lot of 'deep' stuff like tricks and combos for the player to discover. While you will still die arbitrarily to a random occurrence in the true roguelike fashion, knowing these tricks can greatly improve your chances of success and survival.
Sometimes those tricks can be downright unbalanced and exploits rather than features. Those of you who have wished for the PYEC, polypiled and wraith-farmed know what I'm talking about (of course those tricks have been toned down quite a bit since they were discovered). In one game I discovered an early Wand of Wishing and did all three - but still failed the endgame due to some really bad random luck. That's Nethack for you.
Comment Re:Crypto Is For Crime! (Score 1) 39
Just a minor consideration to add to the above.
Your bank could be legally obliged to block the transfer if the target country is on the FATF black list or grey list. Money transfers to those countries are considered to carry an increased risk of terrorist funding and/or money laundering. The list is not long, and it is updated three times a year (and yes, Ghana has been on the grey list, although not anymore, I believe).
I am sure there are perfectly valid non-criminal use cases for crypto but circumventing international restrictions on money laundering and terrorist funding might not be the best example of one.
Comment Re:Underpowered? (Score 1) 23
1993/95 Doom needed something like 4mb ram and 25mhz
4MB may have been to official minimum spec but in practice you needed at least 8MB or the larger levels would crash regularly to memory errors.
Which makes it all the more impressive that you squeezed the core of it into a Super Nintendo version.
Comment Re:My favorite work of fiction, full stop. (Score 1) 75
the first television show to use CGI.
It wasn't. Captain Power and The Soldiers of the Future from the 1980s got it beat by more than half a decade:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Never mind the quality of the CGI. Both series had rather crude and primitive CGI, IMO.
That said, Babylon 5 was easily my #2 favorite scifi TV show of all time. As for #1...well, nothing can possibly ever hope to beat the original 24 episodes of Battlestar Galactica, especially when you first saw them as a kid.
Comment Re:Not many true believers! Want to make a few buc (Score 3, Insightful) 80
What odds will ANY of you give me for public acceptance and acknowledgement that ETs exist?
As long as you're not talking specifically about those ugly "phone home" E.T.s, it is pretty much a certainty that some form of extraterrestrial intelligence does exist. Mathematical probability, given the size of the universe.
However...
Whether they would ever be able to reach us or contact us is a different matter altogether. They might not even have our level of technology. And even if they did, there is the issue of insane distances, again given the size of the universe. This problem is summarily glossed over in popular scifi; in reality, travelling to the next inhabitable planet could take thousands of years. Proxima Centauri, the nearest star to our sun, is over 4 light years away. Over 4 years nonstop traveling at the speed of light - which happens to be impossible given our current understanding of physics. You would need infinite energy to reach the speed of light.
But let's assume there are super-intelligent aliens that have somehow advanced beyond our laws of physics. That is no longer a mathematical probability, by the way, but let's assume it anyway for the sake of an argument.
But of course you're still assuming they would WANT to contact us.
Which reminds me of this...
https://www.reddit.com/media?u...
Comment Re:False promises (Score 3, Funny) 130
You mean like this?
https://www.generationbd.com/i...
Comment Re:duh! (Score 3, Interesting) 37
Not to play the devil's advocate, but a key fact about security is that there no 100% preventative security, nor will there ever be. Even if you could somehow manage it, it would be prohibitively expensive and would probably stop your core business processes. So something will always slip through the cracks and you need to be prepared for that. In fact, this second layer of controls - how reliably you can catch anomalies and how swiftly and efficiently you can react to them - is even more important than your preventative controls. It is also something that tells people whether you are a true security professional or not.
In this case, they had obviously recognized the risk that a foreign agent might get hired since they had implemented detective and corrective controls for it. The controls worked. That's really security risk management 101: identify risks, evaluate their likelihood and impact to determine risk level, then identify and implement controls to bring the risk to an acceptable level. Judging by this story, it seems to me they actually did a pretty decent job there.
So why not implement controls to prevent the hiring of foreign agents in the first place? Point 1, it could be too expensive, laborious and difficult. Your opponents are always finding new innovative ways to target the weak points and blind spots in your business processes. The recent AI tools are only making their job that much easier. But point 2 is the much more relevant one in the corporate world. No listed company I know of has given their CSO or CISO a carte blanche to do whatever they wish and dictate how the other CxOs should conduct their business. In the real world, every CSO and CISO needs to negotiate with the other CxOs, and their security concerns and initiatives regularly get overruled by the CEO in favor of the other party since most CEOs think business first, then leave it to the CSO to secure it. It's not an easy job, it's like "Well, we decided to build a paper ship. It was really the most cost-effective choice. Now it's your task to see to that it will cross the Atlantic safely." (Been there, done that, although not literally of course.)
Oh, did I say no listed company know? Actually - I can think of one pretty well known listed company that has done exactly that, given their CSO a carte blanche to overrule any business decision. But just one company (and I'm not at liberty to name it).
Comment "Criticised" (Score 1) 121
I see what you did, right there in the headline. Clever.
