Comment Re:NoDiablo (Score 1) 102
I suppose that might be one reason they sprang it on us when they did and not earlier. Perhaps — *gasp* — they never wanted our input to begin with. :) How respectful.
Best case scenario, they have some sort of secret emergency plan for removing the always-online requirement for single-player games. Move the missing code down to the client. But even if that were possible, it wouldn't happen fast, or soon. By that point, they've made their billions and they've essentially "won" with their DRM and other nonsense.
So, yeah, perhaps we can't do much here, but I hate not doing anything. Sending a message to other game makers might be enough. Supporting Torchlight 2 instead of Diablo 3 is a good, positive way to send a message to Blizzard, but be sure to visit nodiablo.com and let us know about your decision, or tell Blizzard yourself.
Best case scenario, they have some sort of secret emergency plan for removing the always-online requirement for single-player games. Move the missing code down to the client. But even if that were possible, it wouldn't happen fast, or soon. By that point, they've made their billions and they've essentially "won" with their DRM and other nonsense.
So, yeah, perhaps we can't do much here, but I hate not doing anything. Sending a message to other game makers might be enough. Supporting Torchlight 2 instead of Diablo 3 is a good, positive way to send a message to Blizzard, but be sure to visit nodiablo.com and let us know about your decision, or tell Blizzard yourself.