The problem cuts both ways for these sties, the people wanting the job done use LLM's, and many people doing the job also use LLM's and thus are effectively scamming the client if they are looking for human input.

So let me guess, when the US fines an EU company for breaking the law that is all fair, but when EU fines a US company for breaking a law you are all in tears over what a victim you are in a comment like that? If Google doesn't like the laws in Sweden they are free to leave the EU. I guess in the US if they don't like the laws they just buy some new laws, but it doesn't quite work like that in Europe.

Generally speaking Adyen rates are not expensive per transaction at all. Just you need a certain scale to make Adyen feasible, they basically only want to work with large parties.

These large companies are each hiring tens or hundreds of thousands of people in India and similar places and not hiring in the US right now.

They are not outsourcing, these orgs are hiring themselves directly for the company in these countries. These are huge, fully fledged offices owned by these companies. They are not working remotely. These workers are expected on-site 5 or more days a week and are treated essentially like garbage, just like the employers like it.

This has nothing to do with remote work. These orgs essentially only have grandfathered in highly senior people working remotely. Almost nobody is letting the graduates or foreign workers remote in.

Honestly that integrated gemini in android studio is not that good. But if you point antigravity to that directory it would implement what you described just fine. Basically all of these AI coding tools could do this for well over a year.

Google makes so much money, is it really that important for them to go back on their promises and screw over some individual with a free email address?

Nobody forced them to offer 'lifetime free' promises, you can afford to keep your promise, keep your promise.

Are you challenging my constitutional right to spew my nonsense online?

Sounds more like they are simply refusing to allow Nintendo products to be used for something that is illegal?

And I am guessing what you would consider 'unethical' by nintendo is also them refusing to allow Nintendo products to be used for something that's illegal?

Seems pretty consistent to me.

I feel like you might be confusing value and valuation. A valuation is what you believe a company would hypothetically sell for.
Selling a non-profit for ... profit... is kind of directly against the whole point of a non-profit.

So I would say thinking of the valuation for a non-profit is weird as hell.

Something like the Salvation Army has value of course. Sure, if you could buy the salvation army, there would be buyers lining up for this well known brand with cash in the bank and lots of donations (or revenue if you want). So technically you could be talking about a 'valuation'. But selling shares of it in the hopes of propping up value and selling it again... like that is just a for profit company.

If you let non-profits do that, that is basically just the end of real non-profits.

While paying to support a browser is not controversial, charging users specifically to remove features raises questions about whether those additions are seen as value or clutter.

Those features are largely either revenue generating or straight up advertisements. You essentially pay one time to remove ads which is a pretty common thing in apps.

It's always funny, any time you hear someone say that somebody else's job could easily be replaced with AI.
It's universally about a job they have never done a day in their lives. Programmers, Accountants, Customer Support staff, all supposedly very easy to replace by just plugging in ChatGPT according to 'experts'.

In reality this is just just a fundamental misunderstanding of what an accountant, CS staff or linguist does.

You could buy Hollywood movies on iTunes before Netflix streaming even launched, and iTunes wasn't first either. Movielink launched in 2002, and it was literally a joint venture of Paramount, Sony, MGM, Universal, and Warner Bros. The studios built their own digital delivery platform years before Netflix got into streaming. It flopped, but 'getting Hollywood on board' had already happened.

Netflix pioneered plenty of things. This wasn't one of them.

So any scammer will just use some stolen keys or id & creditcard info and gets easy access to your phone, and legit users will have to jump through stupid hoops including a 24 hour wait period.

They haven't added a single worthwhile feature to android in 5 years and yet their enshittification programme is working fine.

I would say the Neo looks great for this price range, I agree with that, but you are kind of underselling the PC a little.

N150 laptops are usually wayyy cheaper than that. At the 599 range there are decent options with Ryzen CPU's, 16GB RAM, 512GB SSD and reasonable build quality. Especially HP and lenovo have some pretty decent build quality devices in this range.

And really with apple repair costs and quality issues you should include applecare+ for $140 as a necessary addition for any macbook.

In my experience it's really hard to review AI generated code though. The problem is that LLM's whole thing is that they generate tokens that 'look correct'.

If I see a junior's code with a ton of mistake I can spot that from a mile away. LLM generated code looks really good initially, then when you get into the nitty gritty you find out that it can be absolutely riddled with mistakes that are completely non-obvious.

Then the second issue is that it can generated absolutely enormous amounts of such 'visually good looking' code and it will make sure to pass any tests.

LLM's basically are writing review-resistant code and it requires extremely good knowledge of the codebase and company to properly review such code.