Of course it's spin. You don't get to his position without knowing how to spin your films or wanting to maximise revenue. What seems odd is using the entirely public domain evidence gathered by the UAP sub-committee as a justification. David Spergel, the guy who ran that investigation is one of the most hard-nosed, talented and data-driven scientists around. Now, their brief was NOT to confirm or deny the existence of aliens, and they had no access to classified information, and they did indeed conclude there were unexplained phenomena, but that the real issue was the dismissive culture and non reporting of such events, particularly among airforce personnel. However, even the most tantalizing unexplained reports they had are about a trillion miles from suggesting the existence of aliens. In fact because they are so unconvincing and inconclusive, they pretty much boost the null hypothesis. Convincing evidence of aliens wouldn't require any work, it would be self-evident. What we do have is what the acronym says: unexplained aerial phenomena.

The thing about these types of cases is, they are not at all about the defendant and all about lawyers trying toa set precedencts / get novel rulings, and make a name for themselves.

...also the other kinds

Debt? No. Debt is for when you buy, good & services on credit, which is effectively alone and you pay interest on it whether there was a bank involved or not. Here this is something they sold, not bought. I believe the correct balance sheet category would be "Current Liability" but IANAA. if you think this is irrelevant detail for techies you may be right, but on the other hand, accounting practices dictate far more than you realise! Ever wondered why your those credits you bought for that service you don't use expire? Seems dodgy right. But it's simply because the bean counters don't want to see current liabilities - which are considered temporary and operational - into non-current liabilities - which are considered more like problems and impact things like company valuations.

Well that's a little absurd. Almost the entire global economy and every institution in it is verifiably fake and runs on nothing but fear and greed, powerful insiders and political self-interest. If this platonic world where productivity is all that matters actually exists, I'm all for it. But would even they give me a Green card without a shit ton of Bitcoin in my pocket? Unlikely.

It depends. "old" is subjective and potentially making an incorrect assumption about the other party's investment time horizon. For longer term investment, news is a great indicator. For day trading, not so much. Every chart is a fractal. The interpretation changes with every level of zoom.

.. they've helped me pick the local last four or five local minima to a % or so.

I think it's more the fact that they earn most of their money from Google search revenue, and Google needs to keep them on life support because it's cheaper than having antitrust issues. So Mozilla needs to look like they're competing without actually competing to keep the cash flowing.

1.4 billion in reserves? Maybe they could fix thunderbird QR codes

That is all.

The largest economy is Indonesia, 3 times the GDP of Singapore. Thailand, Philippines, Malaysia & Vietnam are all comparable sizes so Singapore so I don't think it stands out for that reason. It's a standout for having hardly any land or natural resources but being a financial and trade centre.

This guy SE Asia's All true, but.. Just the government setting an expectation by passing a law can be partially effective, especially in Asia, though it's not really predictable which laws people take seriously and which they don't. People will report obvious violations for "fun and profit" (i e. receive financial rewards for being a tattle tale), doing much more to curb use. And of course in this case posting content is both visible and verifiable.

Nuff said

Now I don't need to turn it on manually.

This has been the idea from the beginning.