Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Don't know if you all saw this. (Score 1) 539

Engadget and Gizmodo are not pro-Apple. They are pro-pageviews, because that's what fills out their paychecks and in the tech world, there is no surer pageview bait than an Apple related article. If you haven't noticed, Google is now popular they've had Wall-to-Wall coverage of Google for the past week.

Comment Re:That Explains The Updated SDK (Score 1) 1010

Look at mainstream science fiction; one of the holy grails is a computer that just does whatever you tell it to do without giving it any specifics or getting techy. It figures that out on it's own and does it. To most people, this would be magic, and like it or not and despite all their shortcomings, Apple is closer to this goal than any other company.

Comment Re:Stop mentioning Netbooks (Score 1) 1010

This feels like the iPod and iPhone launch all over again with the endless spec sheet checklist comparisons. Netbooks can do a LOT of things. Apple's "magic" is taking the half dozen things that people do the most and doing them well. If they can't do it well, they leave it out until they can figure it out. When I play a full screen video on my netbook, I have to go "oh let me make sure every other application is closed, and all these background services are turned off and that I'm not in super battery saver mode so it doesn't stutter. Let me look up the shortcuts for the player were again because the keys are really small and hard to find in the dark. Let me adjust the screen angle because the viewing angle is so bad." At a certain point in your life you just go "just play the damn thing already so I can enjoy it".

Comment Re:What is the purpose of the ipad? (Score 1) 671

Wrong. The Ipad isn't built for Apple's customers, it's built for Apple.

When you say it "doesn't carry the drawbacks of a computer", you're simply being dishonest: it would cost nothing in user experience to allow multitasking or free installation of software. A full OS X with the iPhone GUI would be fantastic, and relatively easily accomplishable. It would come with no extra draw-backs for the user whatsoever. And you know this perfectly well.

But this would cost Apple a lot, in that a user with choice wouldn't be tied to iTunes. The question is: why are you being dishonest? Apple probably doesn't pay you a cent for your work as a freelance advertising agent. And why is this bullshit so prevalent among Apple fanboys? There's a reason why you guys are called a cult: you are one.

Have you actually used a desktop OS with a touchscreen? I have and they are all gimmicky. Go grab a netbook with a 10" screen. Start sticking your finger all over the screen. Start with the max/min/close buttons and note how your finger more than covered up all three. That's just the start. Almost every UI element is too damn small to be touched or too damn close to something else that you don't want to accidentally press. Microsoft has failed hard over the last decade with tablets because they have engineers like you who only think about the spec sheet and have never actually sat down and tried to use their own product.

Slashdot Top Deals

Thus spake the master programmer: "After three days without programming, life becomes meaningless." -- Geoffrey James, "The Tao of Programming"

Working...