Comment No big deal (Score 2) 3
This ought to be really easy to rectify:
Ask me anything...
>> Hey, how are you doing on all those audits?
No problems.
>> Great! Keep up the good work.
This ought to be really easy to rectify:
Ask me anything...
>> Hey, how are you doing on all those audits?
No problems.
>> Great! Keep up the good work.
What we need is a 2nd study, using 400 students, separated into four groups:
1. Using Google ONLY by looking at the 3rd page of results (the first two pages are now taken up with Gemini AI and targeted advertising).
2. Using ChatGPT Only.
3. Using inventory computers in a large metropolitan library
4. Using old fashioned card catalogs and books.
I wonder if we chose a significantly esoteric subject, with a 100 question exam given after a week, if any useful clustering could be detected.
What the US needs is more blue color workers
Can Smurfs even get a visa these days?
" could seep upward into the Alsace aquifer," implies that the aquifer is *above* the depth of the mine. So the question becomes, what is this magical mine where gravity works backwards?
*All* of the immunotherapy treatments can be considered vaccinations, not just the ones that we give as preventative medicine.
And there are some new ones that are just stunningly good. I've recently seen a presentation on a vaccination for hard cancers that get injected directly into the cancerous mass and don't just improve things, like most radio- and chemotherapies, but *eliminate* the cancer by activating the latent immune cells within the mass. It allows the body to cure itself by removing the cloak of invisibility that cancer creates. This fellow might just win a Nobel. The idea is simple, brilliant, and shockingly effective.
Biggest problem with fiber to an individual room is the lack of fiber interfaces on devices.
Oddly enough, my 30-year-old stereo amplifier has one. I'll finally have a use for it!
Last I heard, Apple sales haven't plummeted and thrown them into bankruptcy, so it sounds like they learned the lesson just fine: it's fine to show people ads. People might complain a little bit, but they won't stop buying. Cost is $0 and ad revenue is presumably more than $0.
If someone is stuck with your proprietary software and you aren't showing them ads, then you're leaving money on the table. What're they gonna do, fork it out?
Where on the planet is not near groundwater?
And yet, the discovery of an anti-gravity mine where contaminants flow UP to the aquifer, should be worth billions.
Where did I say I was expecting similar performance? But Python is slow even for an interpreted language especially given its usually compiled to bytecode first. I would expect similar performance to Java , not run at approx 1/100th the speed of compiled C!
1/100 the speed of compiled languages is typical for interpreted languages.
Non-ancient implementations of Java are fully compiled. Toy benchmarks and Java programs carefully written as if there were no automatic memory management (and don't call standard libraries) can run just as fast ac C code.
Java can't directly support features that depend on dynamic typing and similar flexible run-time behavior that interpreted languages. However, many Java developers sorely miss those features, so they heavily use the reflection APIs and various "beans" frameworks to work around the pre-compilable static typing. This can actually end up running *slower* than Python because many of those Java features are dog slow.
You can already get implementations of Python that do JIT compiling like Java. They often run in the ballpark of about 1/10 the speed of C.
If the CEOs believe it is true, it won't matter that it is true. Reducing headcount and ending hiring is going to be their priority.
I say any company over 50 employees needs to be charged an extra AI tax for eliminating positions, above and beyond the unemployment taxes they already pay on layoffs.
I read TFA, and it specifically says that this is the matter that's causing the gravitational effects that were attributed to dark matter. To me, as a layman, that means that dark matter is no longer required to make things come out right. If you don't agree, please explain why, preferably with citations so that people like me can understand it.
Here's a quote from the article:
This "missing matter" doesn't refer to dark matter, the mysterious stuff that remains effectively invisible because it doesn't interact with light (sadly, that remains an ongoing puzzle).
And there isn't a single instance of the word "gravity" or "gravitation" or "gravitational" on that page until you get to the comments and related readings after the editorial portion is done.
Maybe time to get the eyeglass prescription updated?
Just like an ever increasing amount of "news" in the US, there's some narrative scrambling for clicks rather than facts. US news is starting to push beyond political driven narratives straight into "lying because it's more profitable and we need marketshare".
Directly blame Google for that situation. They're the one who have been aggressively pushing the ad-revenue model. Back before Google, media was supported by a mixture of advertising and subscription. We even had a few media sources that were truly independent and both government-backed, and privately supported by individual subscriptions and contributions. Google poisoned the well, and we are all paying the price.
"Trust me. I know what I'm doing." -- Sledge Hammer