Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 Internet speed test! ×

Comment Re:Going out of business? (Score 1) 242

To really go back to their roots, they'd have to do a lot more than just revamp their product line. Even things as basic as their strategy for locating and sizing stores doesn't quite fit that model. Maintaining a thousand little shops in malls sandwiched in between shoe stores, women's clothing, and sleepnumber bed shops (or whatever else is in a particular mall) doesn't work well for catering to that kind of DIY market.

DIY electronics/Maker support needs to stock lots of different small items that no one person might need to buy in a given day, so I'd bet you can't split your inventory as many ways as they do and survive as a business. How many storefronts could MakerShed support, for example? Plus rental of prominent store-frontage like mall space is probably some of the most expensive. For an Apple store with high product turnover, sure, but not for a reinvented RadioShack. Or if you do, maybe pick one single mall in a big metropolitan city, put a glitzy outlet there, and make it larger so it can hold the inventory people want and actually be a convenience compared to online ordering (rather than an inconvenience when you have to chase down which branch actually has a particular part in stock).

Comment Re:"Support" != actually sacrifice for (Score 1) 458

What's the sacrifice though? Having cars that either get really excellent fuel economy or run on battery power? Forcing electrical utilities to switch to separate billing for grid-tie and power consumption, so that customers that want to put solar panels on their roofs aren't shafted in order to have overnight electrical service from base-load power? Mandating emissions inspections based on original standards at the time of manufacture on all vehicles newer than 30 years, so that gross-polluting vehicles that are not running right are either fixed or taken off the road? Most of these things don't have all that much cost, and for some of them, they're a cost that the individual should have borne anyway.

So basically you don't see people having to sacrifice what they want, because you expect to decide for them what they should want. Anything that begins with "forcing people to do X" or "mandating X" is the antithesis of freedom. You may argue that it's in a good cause, but you can't simply redefine sacrifice to only mean sacrifice from those desires that you prefer to impose on others.

Comment Re:TNG only had a half-dozen good episodes (Score 1) 480

The best episodes weren't familiar at all, they were just good science fiction. There was one episode I remember with some kind of smart tools that were being used at a mining facility, which the miners didn't realize had hit the point of sentient AI. It was thoughtful, and a good performance by Brent Spiner who played a key role, and had nothing to do with most of the more familiar themes of the series (Borg, Q, etc.) "Inner light" was good in part because it was kind of a thoughtful riff on what a civilization might do to preserve some record of itself if it realized it couldn't survive.

But then you get goofy episodes like the one where people de-evolved, which seemed like the producers were just looking for an excuse to put dinosaurs on the Enterprise, or the one the person above mentioned with Geordi and Ro. Every version of ST hit those low points at times, but TNG hit the high points more than most of them in the same era. You can argue TOS and I won't press it either way, but Voyager (ick) etc.

I think that on average B5 was better, and voted that way, but if the question was "which series had the single best individual episode" I might answer differently. But I favor continuity from episode to episode, and ST tosses that out on everything from what their tech actually *does* to who they worry about as a threat to the Federation.

Comment Re:Uninterested people aren't worth it (Score 1) 480

With less people voting it takes fewer for anomalous results to happen. Whether that's good or bad depends on your point of view.

Example 1: In Maryland there was an election held one year in which a particular (fairly low level) elected position was being eliminated mid-year, so nobody ran for it. Some guy noticed and wrote himself in, and was elected. Bingo, salary for half a year, with no particular duties, since there was no expectation of someone actually holding the office.

Example 2: International Planetary Society annual conference. Several of the scientists who favored a gravitationally-based definition of a planet (gravitationally cleared its orbital path) rather than a mass-based definition (massive enough to form a spherical shape) waited until the end of the convention, when most of their opponents had left, to hold a vote on redefining planets. Bingo, got what they want, Pluto is no longer a planet.

Comment Re:Luggable? (Score 1) 325

A couple of options here, depending on what the boss is into, and wants to shell out for.

One, try an iMac plus a laptop with a mini-displayport output (or a Macbook pro). You can offload some processing to the iMac when you need, plus you can start it up in "target display mode" and use it as a second big monitor with your laptop.

Or, less expensive but still in the "looks portable to the boss" category, get a laptop plus a cube PC to offload some processing to. Remote desktop to the cube just like it's a server. And possibly the Macbook pros will run in target-display mode too, I haven't looked--in which case it could double for the monitor for the cube, keeping your desk more open if that's a priority. Or just get a big monitor anyway (lots of screen real-estate) that can switch inputs between the cube and the laptop. And you always still have the laptop for real portability.

Comment Re:I'm sure it will suck (Score 1) 242

This is partly because Foundation was kind of an experimental attempt to write a story where the story line was carried in the dialog and the action took place off camera. That might make it a bit challenging to make into a script, since key action scenes don't actually occur and would have to be created from whole cloth.

Comment Re:No thank you (Score 1) 267

+1 for Ocean's 11.

And don't forget that before Peter Jackson, the best available movie version of Lord of the Rings was an animated musical.

And finally, does anyone seriously believe Adam West was better as Batman in the 1960s than any of the more recent movies?

I think that's three.

Comment Re:Still being made... (Score 1) 304

Corsairs are good too, but they have a shorter than average key throw that doesn't sit quite as well with my typing habits; my fingers always want to keep pressing even when the key is already all the way down. (I learned on the old Model M's we had in my high school AP Comp Sci class, back in the 80s when the IBM PS/2s were a new thing). Otherwise I agree it's a solid product, and we have one attached to an old iMac our son uses.

I didn't know about the Razer driver issue; the last Razer mouse and keyboard I had didn't need a driver installed at all; they seemed to work out fine of the box.

Das Keyboard is another option, with a good typing feel, and I use one of these at work, but I tend to rate it just a step down from the Decks, because the keycaps are printed on instead of two-color molded plastic.

Comment Re:Still being made... (Score 1) 304

There are still good alternatives that have the keys and the feel and heft, even beyond the Unicomps. Deck keyboards with Cherry Blue switches, for example. Or maybe Razer (they have the switches, don't know about the weight). Or for Macs, the Matias keyboards.

Comment Re:Small Orion reflector (Score 1) 187

From personal experience, our son was able to learn and use a Starblast 4.5" pretty easily in 4th grade. My wife and I are both members of our local astronomy club, and have been into astronomy a long time, so we were able to give him help when needed, but also we took him to some of the public events for the club, and let him go to it. He enjoyed one project in particular where he tracked the galilean moons of Jupiter over several nights, sketching out their positions in a notebook, and he still likes using it to show planets to other kids at these sorts of events a couple of years later.

Binoculars are a good starting place for adults, but harder to work with kids with, in my opinion, because you can't point them at something and then show it to the child, nor can they really get your help interpreting what they're seeing.

Slashdot Top Deals

Stinginess with privileges is kindness in disguise. -- Guide to VAX/VMS Security, Sep. 1984