You are completely ignoring the fact that they agreed to the amendment.
Amazon at some point was offering 20%
Amazon then wrote to them and said "what about 0%"
They said, no, what about 20%?
Amazon said, no, it's 0%
THEY AGREED.
End of story.
No..seems pretty clear. Amazon offered 0%. They accepted and got 0%. 0% of $0 is....well, $0.
Moral of the story - read the contract?
Not long now until they place that chip in your head.
In other news...tin foil sales have gone through the roof.
"In the US, the bulk of net use (in pure data) is business related"
Got any stats to back this up? I would have guessed that YouTube/NetFlix/piracy/porn..etc would be orders of magnitude greater than pure business traffic. Unless you mean YouTube is a business and therefore business related?
Don't let facts get in the way of a good story.
They are likely grateful that people are using their software rather than the superior (and free) Microsoft Security Essentials. (Yes, MS makes a piece of software that is superior in virtually every way to its competition. Hard to believe, but it's true.)
Security Essentials isn't "free" for businesses with more than 10 PC's. The original owner of the Avast licence had 14 PC's so wouldn't qualify for Security Essentials.
The Linux kernel uses something called kernel shared memory (KSM) to achieve this with it's virtualization technology. LWN has a great article on it:
Is the reverse possible? I.e. explicit content only??!!
Aside from the obvious point-of-view that this is almost theft, doesn't this mean the University can afford to invest in more research and therefore invent more cool technologies?
For large values of one, one equals two, for small values of two.
