Comment Re:Is 1.77 tons of enriched uranium a WMD? (Score 1) 1866
Just a quick question, if they dont find a nuke... but they find 1.77 tons of enriched uranium, is it NOT a Weapon of Mass Destruction?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/38722 01.stm
Should we call tons of enriched uranium, a "PWMD (Potential Weapon of Mass Destruction)"?
or:
"ASTBWBWMD (A Soon To Be Wanna Be Weapon of Mass Destruction )"
And for those of you dont believe anything else than CNN:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/07/07/iraq.nuc lear/
Although they called it 'low-enriched', and only sutable for making a 'dirty-bomb'... Are dirty bombs not 'Weapons of Mass Destruction'?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3872
Should we call tons of enriched uranium, a "PWMD (Potential Weapon of Mass Destruction)"?
or:
"ASTBWBWMD (A Soon To Be Wanna Be Weapon of Mass Destruction )"
And for those of you dont believe anything else than CNN:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/07/07/iraq.nu
Although they called it 'low-enriched', and only sutable for making a 'dirty-bomb'... Are dirty bombs not 'Weapons of Mass Destruction'?
