NSA was cranking along connecting 98% of all spoofed numbers to other spoofed numbers when they suddenly realized that 100% of their data was crap.

Amazon should take the HQ2 to another city, perhaps in Alabama where the German rocket scientists went after World War II. The children and grandchildren of the scientists that built the Saturn V rocket for the Apollo moon landings are in Alabama, and they could handle all the AWS programming needed by Amazon and more.

I disagree. It disturbs Amazon the same way that it disturbs all the rest of us: Cheating and lying by sellers is against the interests of all. Seller beware!

I agree. Although it would cost Amazon some money, it would sweep away nearly all of Amazon's competition.

There is no "cost to society of supporting that wealth". It's just a bunch of stock certificates.

And since Amazon is more efficient than Wal-Mart, and Amazon pays more to entry level workers, Wal-Mart will go out of business and leave Amazon with most of the market.

Amazon pays more than Wal-Mart, so Wal-Mart will disappear first.

Amazon pays a lot more than minimum wage to starting workers.

It is basic statistics and science, and it is unescapable. Law can present equal opportunity, but if you enforce equal outcome it will require denying opportunities to males based on their gender. http://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/wa...

The plaintiff may sue whoever used it incorrectly. Subsequently, CBC may hold CNN responsible for their losses in court if CBC can show that it relied on CNN's presentation of facts in entering into their agreement, or the decision may assign all responsibility to one or all of the parties. The plaintiff does not need to locate the person ultimately responsible prior to making their claim of infringement.

The passage you cited only permits YouTube to display the user's content. Another section of the TOS prohibit use of the material unless done through YouTube. Section 5B of the TOS: "You shall not copy, reproduce, distribute, transmit, broadcast, display, sell, license, or otherwise exploit any Content for any other purposes without the prior written consent of YouTube or the respective licensors of the Content. YouTube and its licensors reserve all rights not expressly granted in and to the Service and the Content." Section 6C: "For clarity, you retain all of your ownership rights in your Content." The copyright law cited is fairly clear. Removal of the copyright notice is a violation, and the act of removal also indicates willfullness and intent.

If there is no privacy, then why are you posting as AC?

Further proof that back doors will be hacked has already happened! http://it.slashdot.org/story/1...

No, I'm not saying that anyone who breaks into your computer is a bad guy. What I am saying is that if the FBI gets a back door to do good things, then they also greatly increase the chance of crimes being committed by criminals who use the same back door the FBI uses. I am also saying that is that without back doors, a rogue FBI agent violating his authority can do damage to people and the nation, but that a rogue FBI agent violating his authority and with back doors can do extremely large amounts of damage to people and the nation.

And performance recordings are copyrightable. All driving data is owned by the author (driver), not the auto company. Legally, they should have no say in how the data is used unless they buy it from the driver.