Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Forward to the past (Score 1) 250

'Albums' as such came about WAY long ago when the standard audio medium was a 78 rpm record. Generally speaking, it was one song-per side, so one disk = 2 songs. So to compile say, 10 or 12 songs by any artist, or maybe put a whole symphony into a single package, multiple disks were put into a bound book of record sleeves (literally, an 'album' of records). When technology changed and brought about 33-1/3 LPs (Long Play, for the kids out there) the same number of tracks could be put onto a single disk; when CDs came along, they just copied the current de facto standard. The idea that you have to continue to somehow package 'albums' within the context of digital distribution is absurd. Sure, bundle tracks that form parts of a coherent whole, or can be mashed-up to, say, feature all recorded versions of a song over the years, but stop forcing artists to come up with filler, and let them do their thing instead.
 
/late to the part I know
//at least no one has to read my rants
///and *stay* off my lawn.

Data Storage

Submission + - Amazing Memory Density Achieved at ASU (wired.com)

Mr. Fahrenheit writes: Wired is reporting that Arizona State researchers "have developed a low-cost, low-power computer memory that could put terabyte-sized thumb drives in consumers' pockets within a few years." "The new memory technology — programmable metallization cell (PMC) — comes as current storage technologies are starting to reach their physical limits." PMC involves the on-demand creation of copper nano-wire bridges and probably a couple of small-animal sacrifices to make the magic work.

Slashdot Top Deals

How much net work could a network work, if a network could net work?

Working...