Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:China wins (Score 1) 91

Tesla doesn't lose as they were never actually going to mass produce affordable humanoid robots with AI anyway.

Ironically anyone who wanted to build a factory in the US because of tarriffs and wanted to use chinese robots with legs to help automate that factory may now be losers too. Interestingly robots with legs have been around since at least 1813 when they built Brunton's Mechanical Traveller, which was terrifying but only ended up killing 13 people.

Comment Re:Bullshit (Score 1) 47

Yeah, searching for anything in Reddit using Reddit's own search function is terrible but google can actually do the job. This baffles me, along with other basic features of reddit that have been broken or very buggy for years - in a time when people can SUPPOSEDLY use AI to code 10,000 lines a day and fix bugs like there's no tomorrow.

Comment Re:Even if the features appealed... (Score 2) 106

I guess they would say there were a lot of iphone like products that flopped before the iphone. But no, the iphone is obviously useful, the smart speaker is just obviously annoying.

Now I do see the possibility of great smartspeakers someday in the future but they would need to

A: be fun to talk to instead of grating (OpenAI has a long, long way to go with this)
B: know you very well without it being creepy (probably by having a local ai running in a box in your home)
C: And maybe tailor their personality to one that fits with yours to the point where you can develop a disturbing & unhealthy friendship-like relationship.

Otherwise it will always just feel like talking to a corporate goon that will blandly read wikipedia articles to you.

Comment Re:what? (Score 4, Funny) 106

I can kinda see what they're thinking:

"we could make it a phone app but we want to sell a physical object, and if it was just a thing with a screen it might as well be an app, so we'll make it a speaker, which could also be an app, but is sorta more divorced from the phone I guess. HEY get off our backs we don't have any new ideas, we just need to keep building the possibility we may become a huge apple-like company by saying we're developing this device WHICH WILL BE REVOLUTIONARY. Also old people don't know how to use AI -or phones really- but they sure as hell know how to yell at smart speakers!"

Comment whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap (Score 5, Insightful) 251

We could have been working for the last decade or 3 to make this a great country to have and raise children in but nah, we decided to have the most expensive healthcare system in the world (by far), no provisions for childcare for workers, no maturnity leave laws, no social safty net that would make having children less risky and very expensive housing.

Instead we were politically focused on getting rid of immigrants, which we'll eventually need to import more of because we don't have any young people because we were too focused on getting rid of immigrants to make life stable & happy enough for anyone to have babies.

Comment Re:Google Glass (Score 1, Insightful) 72

I feel like Zuckerberg must personally dispise facebook, because its his only real success and is just a sad place where old people endless discuss politics and share shitty hardwarming ai memes. You can kinda tell when you log in to fb - its been just squeezed for ad cash and enshittified to the max, they don't care about it at all, they want to move on, but they can't because they suck.

Comment Nah (Score 3, Insightful) 72

I mean I'm not going to be hanging out with anyone wearing smart glasses anyway. That's an automatic trip to my permanent shit list.

If everyone starts wearing them then that doesn't make it ok, fuck everyone in that case. Just because foot-binding was popular in China 200 years ago didn't make it ok either.

Comment Re:There is a real issue there (Score 3, Informative) 120

"it would actually be useful to have a good secure way to verify to my bank for example that I'm actually the person accessing my banking account"

We have one. Its called passwords with 2 factor identification. It works and has for years and decades.

Is it perfect? No. Is the overly complicated and privacy invasive system that people are proposing likely to be better? No.

Comment Re:Opendoor (Score 3, Interesting) 29

They're basically a memestock whose value went up 1000% last year for no particular reason. Unlike many memestocks the value of the shares hasn't decreased much since then, down only 50%. They are doing the usual "we're going to transform this lazy business of real estate with innovation and tech including tolkenizing everything on the blockchain and completely take over and be the next amazon!"

Comment Re:Why do we need a giant publicly funded moon bas (Score 2) 83

I don't think most people in the world, even americans, would agree that just because you are operating some absurdly expensive moon base gives you the right to claim the entire moon. If we did try saying that I would expect China to just ignore us, which would be the reasonable thing to do. Of course its also probably in China's best interests to let us burn even more of our money on stupid nonsense like a moon race where only one side is actually racing while the other side is taking over world trade and technological development.

Slashdot Top Deals

"If truth is beauty, how come no one has their hair done in the library?" -- Lily Tomlin

Working...