Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 Internet speed test! ×

Comment 8 hours never felt like enough to me (Score 1) 117

I honestly don't understand how people manage on such little sleep, even 8-hours seems marginal. It seems to me that I need 80 hours total per week (average 10 per day). If I skimp on that by sleeping "only" 8 (or fewer) hours a day, I just end up sleeping in even more on the weekend to make it up.

I was diagnosed with sleep apnea, and putting me on a CPAP eliminated my snoring but did nothing for the duration of sleep I seem to desire. I typically wake 2-3 times in the early morning (that I am aware of) but I desperately want to get back into whatever I was dreaming about (hate leaving whatever I was urgently doing unfinished) and in the absence of interruptions I usually fall right back to sleep.

I the morning (after 10 or so hours) I don't feel refreshed at all, more bleary-eyed and hyper-sensitive to light and sound (no, I don't drink alcohol) with heavy, lethargic limbs that don't want to move. I also desperately want to get back into the last dream and finish whatever it was I was doing, which is extra-frustrating when the memory of what I was doing quickly fades leaving me with the vague sense that I was doing something really important but now I've forgotten what it even was.

The only thing that seems to help is a late wake-up time. It seems like if I can sleep in all the way until 7:00-7:30-ish I wake up much easier and it almost doesn't matter how late I go to bed. But of course that's incompatible with job-having.

Comment Re: Machines replacing bank tellers? (Score 1) 285

If Farmer Bob owns a lot of fields, it might pull him up into being one of the rich elites (hell he might already be a rich elite if he's running a big agribusiness now). Smaller farmers might be able to rent access to their fields and scrape by, but I bet sooner or later some misfortune hits like a cancer that some rich elite will happily have his robo-doctors cure... if Farmer Bob sells his field.
Of course, those of us who don't own farm fields (you know, the vast majority of us) won't be leveraging farm fields in the robo-future.

Comment Re:Now with more distortion (Score 1) 321

I remember the maps changing over in the mid-Eighties. Seventies and early-Eighties all the world maps in school were centered (left to right) on Kansas, with Asia and Australia on the left, and Europe and Africa on the right. That meant there was a split somewhere in the middle-east. If you looked carefully, you could tell that the left and right edges overlapped a little bit.
In the mid-Eighties the "old" maps slowly got replaced with "international" maps with the Americas on the left and Eurasia on the right. Some grumpy old conservatives complained (yes even back then) that this was all a plot to take away American pride.

Comment Re:We've known this for years (Score 1) 352

I work in a pretty broad cross-section of industries, and the start time for almost everyone is 7:00am. If they don't start at 7:00am, it's because they start at 6:00am.
It's only office types (which I know are over-represented here on Slashdot) that get to wait until after the sun is up before work starts.

Comment Re:Bull (Score 4, Insightful) 644

At some point though, the rich won't need money from the masses. They will be able to just directly order their robo-factories to directly build their yachts and mega-mansions, using robo-manufactured components built from robo-harvested raw materials. If they don't personally own robo-companies that have what they need, they can just trade with other 1%ers who do own the right robo-resources.

They probably will need a few lesser humans (at least in the beginning) to fill in the gaps that robots can't (yet) do. But that will just be an issue of enticing the best of the best non-1%ers with the opportunity to live in the servants' wing of their robo-built mansion and eat the leftovers of their robo-harvested food.

Right now they only need money from the masses so they can use that money to employee the masses. That dependancy goes away of you already own vast armies of robots that serve you for free.

Comment Re:Or course not. (Score 1) 406

Ever felt guilty about not doing anything on a lazy Sunday

Um, no? On the rare occasions that I get a lazy Sunday where I don't have to work and I don't have a bunch of chores back-logged from not being able to do them when I was working, the thoughts I usually have are "why can't every day be like this?" and "Damn, it's over already?"

Comment Re:One reason: (Score 1) 406

It makes a cute quote, but it's not really the type of activity that makes work suck. What I "love doing" is not dealing with deadlines, stress, or the responsibilities of other people depending on my work.

Take away those pressures and even stuff like digging holes or cleaning is fun. Because as soon as it stops being fun you move on to something else.

So really the only way to "love what I'm doing" is to not "have to" do it, and be able to stop doing it and move on to something else whenever I want. Which describes no job ever, pretty much by definition.

Comment Re:The Ghost of Ned Ludd (Score 1) 414

There is clearly something wrong with that article's math. There are about 300,000,000 Americans, out of about 7 billion people on Earth. Which means Americans are over 4% of the world's population. So even if the poorest American is richer than the richest non-American (obviously false) you would still have to be in the top 25% of Americans to be in the world's top 1%. So do you honestly think $33k per year puts you in the top quartile of Americans?

Slashdot Top Deals

Real Programmers don't write in PL/I. PL/I is for programmers who can't decide whether to write in COBOL or FORTRAN.

Working...