Re:Objective viewpoint (Score 3, Insightful)

Almost without exception, the lead stories have links. These links are mostly to Groklaw, who themselves give links to all the relevant info. Thus, the info is there. As for the tone, I hardly think you could expect *any* publication to be without bias. For example, Forbes.com always reports in favour of Microsoft and SCO - no-one seems to be doing anything about that. What is worse, is that they don't even link data that could be useful to dissenters! Furthermore, ./ is more about the comments. This is what makes it so different to (say) Forbes - you are entitled to post an opinion, and correct what you consider to be distorted facts. Anyone who only reads the head stories in /., is not really a /. reader, n'est-ce pas? So, is Slashdot opinionated? Yeah, perhaps. Biased? No, I don't really think you have a case here.