Comment Simply Not True (Score 2) 163

by Mofassa on Wednesday October 26, 2011 @04:44PM (#37848754) Attached to: RIM PlayBook Email App Nowhere In Sight

RIMs official blog post on their website that is linked to states "bring our...email integration capabilities to the tablet category." Only BBM is being delayed with no view in sight. http://blogs.blackberry.com/2011/10/blackberry-playbook-2-update/

Comment Re:Integration / Banning (Score 2) 213

by Mofassa on Wednesday August 03, 2011 @12:26PM (#36973994) Attached to: Google+ Registers 25 Million Visitors

I believe Google responded stating that the Google+ violations were not banning site wide, this is outlined in their ToS as well.

Comment Re:First post! (Score 1) 432

by Mofassa on Thursday April 15, 2010 @10:35AM (#31857556) Attached to: The Genius In Apple's Vertical Platform

For reference - http://www.chipworks.com/A4_is_Samsung_45nm.aspx ...about as conclusive as it can get

Which Game Series Would You Reboot? 1120

Posted by Soulskill on Tuesday July 28, 2009 @09:56AM from the star-control-please dept.

Franchise reboots are all the rage these days in Hollywood, and the trend is starting to creep into the games industry as well. The Guardian's games blog is running a story discussing a few examples and pondering likely candidates for future reboots. Quoting: "If anything, the concept of the reboot makes more sense in the videogame sector than it does in movies. For a start, games are complex entities, with each new iteration in a familiar series adding many, many hours of fresh narrative content. Entering, say, the Zelda, Resident Evil, Half-Life, Dragon Quest or Metal Gear worlds at this stage must be massively intimidating — even if the developers go to great lengths to make each entry work as a singular, self-contained entity within the canon. Also, videogames are going through a paradigm shift in terms of popular appeal at the moment. The faithful audience of young males has been joined by new demographics brought in by the Wii, PC casual games, and now the iPhone. Many of these people may be vaguely aware of long-running game brands, but won't have a clue about the key characters, sign post events and basic gameplay mechanisms." So, which series (or individual title) would you like to see rebooted?

Comment Re:Why not? (Score 2, Informative) 208

by Mofassa on Friday March 06, 2009 @06:01PM (#27098333) Attached to: Windows 7 Kill Switch For IE Confirmed — For More Apps, Too

This is stated clearly in the blog post:

These same files are staged so that the features can easily be added back to the running OS without additional media. This staging is important feedback we have received from customers who definitely do not like to dig up the installation DVD.

and

A second decision is that we also continue to support the APIs available for features where these APIs are necessary to the functionality of Windows or where there are APIs that are used by developers that can be viewed as independent of the component. As many of you know these are often referred to as âoedependenciesâ and with Windows the dependencies can run both internal to Windows and external for ISVs.

Comment Re:Politicians beware (Score 1) 426

by Mofassa on Monday February 16, 2009 @02:17PM (#26874853) Attached to: Facebook's New Terms of Service

Removing your name from a picture is as simple as clicking a "remove" button beside your name on said picture. I believe after that if anyone tries to "retag" you, you get sent a notification stating someone wants to tag you in the photo. I'm not sure if there are archives kept of who has been previously tagged in a photo etc.

Post-Beta Windows 7 Build Leaked With New IE8 332

Posted by timothy on Thursday February 12, 2009 @07:56PM from the seekret-leaks-from-nowhere-in-particular dept.

CWmike writes "A post-beta version of Windows 7, Build 7022, leaked to Internet file-sharing sites also includes an updated version of IE8, according to searches at several BitTorrent trackers. With Microsoft halting new Windows 7 beta downloads on Tuesday, and blocking all downloads as of noon (EST) today, users are again turning to illegal sources to get the new operating system."

Comment Re:Well then (Score 1) 1056

by Mofassa on Thursday February 12, 2009 @03:36PM (#26831905) Attached to: Court Rules Autism Not Caused By Childhood Vaccine

So what do you suggest? We abandon vaccines altogether? To the best of my knowledge all medical proceedures have a risk of side effects, and at the end of the day, if the benefit far outweighs the risk. If there is no possible way to know something, there is no reason they should be held responsible for their actions. I'm no lawyer, but to the best of my knowledge, the liability of a company depends on them exercising sound judgment. I would much rather have doctors decided which vaccines I need to take than, well any politician, parent, or myself. Imagine the public outrage if a company developed a vaccination against AIDS/HIV, but found out that 0.00001% of those who take the vaccine developed a deadly side effect - and as such they decided to hold it back. We can't have it both ways - the human body and nature is filled with ambiguity, and unless we offer protection to side effects which had no reasonable way of determining, the incentive to release a vaccine or treatment would be next to nothing.

Court Rules Autism Not Caused By Childhood Vaccine 1056

Posted by timothy on Thursday February 12, 2009 @03:00PM from the thanks-court dept.

wiredog writes "From The Washington Post comes word that three special masters have decided that MMR vaccines do not cause autism. 'Special master George Hastings said the parents ... had "been misled by physicians who are guilty, in my view, of gross medical misjudgment." ... "the evidence advanced by the petitioners has fallen far short of demonstrating ... a link."'

Comment Re:Georgia Tech has a center under construction (Score 1) 51

by Mofassa on Saturday June 24, 2006 @02:08PM (#15596971) Attached to: World Class Nanotechnology Research Center Opens

I can't find the link right now, but I beleive my university (Univeristy of Waterloo) and Georgia have signed a nice little deal. Both are investing huge amounts of money into nanotechnology (our Centre for Nanotechnology and Quantum computing is supposed to be completed in 2010). I'm actually lucky enough to be in that first batch of graduating Nanotechnology engineers. Cost of ours is around the same, we're getting tons of money from RIM. Here's the link :)
http://www.nanotech.uwaterloo.ca/research/qnc.html and for mearly bragging rights, our nano building's bigger than yours...wait...is that a good thing?