Comment Re:Archlinux is CRAP (Score 1) 68
aliquis said:
"And to answer on your my e-penis are bigger than yours I've used Linux since 1995, sometimes thereabout (maybe 96) I installed RedHat on my home machine and a little while after that debian slink, I used debian until 98 when I installed FreeBSD on a machine with broken IDE controller, didn't got it working so I tried OpenBSD and got some help with turning off DMA or whatever was the issue and the system worked. Back then I ran OpenBSD at home, later replaced with NetBSD and when I got a new machine Gentoo, after that FreeBSD. I run an IRC server which ran OpenBSD which I upgraded from something like 2.5 to 3.5 without the system breaking (if it wasn't my fault due to CFLAGS), it runs NetBSD 2.0 now thought since I like the system layout of that OS a little more."
So then does that mean that my "e-penis" is bigger than yours, since I have only been using Linux for one year, and can handle the maybe 5 config file changes I have to make with Arch?
aliquis said:
"Because they haven't really learned enough to fix their system when it breaks.", I shouldn't have to, I guess I've grown from the "fix all the broken stuff"-issue.
If you cant handle doing a little fixing when things go wrong, then use an abacus. There is no such thing as a 100% problem free OS, and never will be. But if you were using arch, and used ONLY the current stable repo, you would be well ahead of debian, and it would NOT break. Its just so sad that you "SAY" you have been using Linux for 10 years, and whine like a Windows ME user. Maybe if you put more effort into learning to use an OS than bashing one, you would see the beauty of Arch. But hey, some people like to have a machine that runs almost as slow as Windoze, must be conditioned for it.
"And to answer on your my e-penis are bigger than yours I've used Linux since 1995, sometimes thereabout (maybe 96) I installed RedHat on my home machine and a little while after that debian slink, I used debian until 98 when I installed FreeBSD on a machine with broken IDE controller, didn't got it working so I tried OpenBSD and got some help with turning off DMA or whatever was the issue and the system worked. Back then I ran OpenBSD at home, later replaced with NetBSD and when I got a new machine Gentoo, after that FreeBSD. I run an IRC server which ran OpenBSD which I upgraded from something like 2.5 to 3.5 without the system breaking (if it wasn't my fault due to CFLAGS), it runs NetBSD 2.0 now thought since I like the system layout of that OS a little more."
So then does that mean that my "e-penis" is bigger than yours, since I have only been using Linux for one year, and can handle the maybe 5 config file changes I have to make with Arch?
aliquis said:
"Because they haven't really learned enough to fix their system when it breaks.", I shouldn't have to, I guess I've grown from the "fix all the broken stuff"-issue.
If you cant handle doing a little fixing when things go wrong, then use an abacus. There is no such thing as a 100% problem free OS, and never will be. But if you were using arch, and used ONLY the current stable repo, you would be well ahead of debian, and it would NOT break. Its just so sad that you "SAY" you have been using Linux for 10 years, and whine like a Windows ME user. Maybe if you put more effort into learning to use an OS than bashing one, you would see the beauty of Arch. But hey, some people like to have a machine that runs almost as slow as Windoze, must be conditioned for it.
