Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Games

Pirates as a Marketplace 214

John Riccitiello, the CEO of Electronic Arts, made some revealing comments in an interview with Kotaku about how the company's attitudes are shifting with regard to software piracy. Quoting: "Some of the people buying this DLC are not people who bought the game in a new shrink-wrapped box. That could be seen as a dark cloud, a mass of gamers who play a game without contributing a penny to EA. But around that cloud Riccitiello identified a silver lining: 'There's a sizable pirate market and a sizable second sale market and we want to try to generate revenue in that marketplace,' he said, pointing to DLC as a way to do it. The EA boss would prefer people bought their games, of course. 'I don't think anybody should pirate anything,' he said. 'I believe in the artistry of the people who build [the games industry.] I profoundly believe that. And when you steal from us, you steal from them. Having said that, there's a lot of people who do.' So encourage those pirates to pay for something, he figures. Riccitiello explained that EA's download services aren't perfect at distinguishing between used copies of games and pirated copies. As a result, he suggested, EA sells DLC to both communities of gamers. And that's how a pirate can turn into a paying customer."

Comment Who said Linux is impervious to malware? (Score 0) 600

I could knit-pick your grammar, but is this overall claim based in empirical research? Linux certainly has it's flaws and while it's not susceptible to WINDOWS malware, it certainly is to a variety of others. Perhaps take a look at http://insecure.org/ or http://www.packetstormsecurity.org/. Both of these sites maintain lists of exploits to various version of Linux and many other types of GNU software as well. Rootkits most generally fall into the realm of 'malware' and once you've got root, baby, you've got the world.

Comment RBL's maybe the reason... (Score 0) 597

Your provider likely runs an rbl check at the smtp server level which is not always the same scanning mechanism - rbl's are continually updated and can be far more accurate at blocking spam if a host or set of hosts are blocked - it can very much seem like a sudden turn around in the amount of email you're getting because known spam sources are eventually blacklisted. So while your isp may not have actually changed anything at their server level the 3rd party rbl filters (spamcop, spamhaus, etc) are continually updating their own lists which directly affect your email.h

Slashdot Top Deals

Never call a man a fool. Borrow from him.

Working...